Select committee: Public Accounts Committee

Recommendation 18

64th Report - Costs of clinical negligence Published 30 Jan 2026 Addressed to HM Treasury
Recommendation (the committee's words)
NHS Resolution told us that harmed children require care costs for decades into the future.37 Damages can include compensation for pain and suffering, care costs, future lost earnings, educational support and accommodation adaptations. They are calculated based on a claimant’s specific circumstances and to reflect differing needs throughout their remaining life. Compensation awards for these claims have also increased due to new precedents set by the courts, for example around access to innovative or novel treatment options.38 NHS Resolution told us that these changing precedents have driven up costs over time.39 One participant in our roundtable questioned whether the current tort based legal system was fit for purpose and whether there should be changes. Others suggested possible lessons to be learned from the private sector and how commercial insurers go about assessing high value claims. It was also suggested that an amendment to the Pre-Action protocol to better reflect the complexities of clinical negligence claims by providing a more realistic framework than it currently does for the investigation of those claims.40 Secondly, adopting 36 C&AG’s Report, paras 8, 2.19-2.10 37 Q 35 38 C&AG’s Report, paras 1.11, 2.8 39 Q 35 40 Pre-Action Protocol for the Resolution of Clinical Disputes – Civil Procedure Rules – Justice UK, updated March 2024 14 a similar approach to rehabilitation, specifically the Rehabilitation code.41 Also, the cost of expert reports in clinical negligence average £3,100 and quite often two reports are needed. Significantly we heard about the case of Wiseman, currently before the Supreme Court relating to lost years.42 We await the outcome of this case to understand its implications.

From: Public Accounts Committee, 64th Report - Costs of clinical negligence (HC 1234), 30 January 2026

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 7 April 2026 (deadline 30 March 2026).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government agrees with the Committee's recommendation to set out an operational plan on clinical negligence, disagrees with others, and has some recommendations "under consideration".

  • It agrees to write to the Committee "by this Autumn" with its workplan, key milestones and likely areas of focus for reform, but "disagrees" with publishing David Lock KC's review, saying it has "no current plans" to publish a separate report.
  • It "disagrees" with estimating and tracking the costs of treating avoidable harm, stating it "would not be financially or logistically feasible", and "disagrees" with a new national data-sharing system, saying "there is already data sharing arrangements in place".
  • On maternity, it agrees with the recommendation to learn lessons. Baroness Amos has confirmed the independent investigation will publish its final report in June 2026, and a National Maternity and Neonatal Taskforce will develop a national action plan.
  • Alternative dispute mechanisms and fixed recoverable costs are "under consideration", and the government is "unable to commit" to the six-month timeframe for double recovery estimates. It will write to the Committee by Autumn 2026 on each.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error