Source · Select Committees · Public Accounts Committee

Recommendation 6

6

Unless local authority accounts are useful, relevant and understandable they will not aid accountability.

Recommendation
Unless local authority accounts are useful, relevant and understandable they will not aid accountability. Changes in auditing standards, such as on auditing pensions and grant distribution, have required considerable extra audit time. Some local authorities also have increasingly complex financial arrangements. The more property investments a local authority holds, the more specialist resources the auditor needs to gain accurate estimates of their values. We are concerned that some of the additional audit work now being carried out is disproportionate to the risk to the overall financial stability of the local authority. The accountability of local authorities to stakeholders, such as residents and service users, through audited accounts is a priority. Yet, the accounts of local authorities are impenetrable to many stakeholders. There could be much greater transparency in the financial reporting of local authorities, such as through the inclusion of a simple standard statement, focused on the key issues of most use and relevance to stakeholders, presented in a readily understandable way. The Department is working with others to look at simplifying aspects of the accounts of local authorities. It intends that the new system leader will also look into reducing accounting and audit requirements for areas of less risk to local authorities. Recommendation: The Department should write to us by September 2021 with its detailed plans for agreeing with stakeholders ways to focus local authority accounts and audits on areas of greatest risk and concern to citizens. Local auditor reporting on local government in England 9 1 Accountability, transparency and quality in local authority audits
Government Response

A response document is linked to this report, dated 28 October 2021. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document ↗