Select committee: Public Accounts Committee

Recommendation 12

64th Report - Costs of clinical negligence Published 30 Jan 2026 Addressed to HM Treasury
Recommendation (the committee's words)
The 2025 Dash review of patient safety found that the current system for raising complaints and concerns is confusing, with issues often poorly handled and patients subject to delays and poor-quality responses. Research commissioned by NHS Resolution found that improving the NHS’s initial response to harmful incidents could reduce the number of patients who pursue clinical negligence claims.21 However, in their written submissions to us, multiple organisations raised concerns about how inconsistently NHS trusts apply the statutory requirement to be open and transparent with patients, known as ‘duty of candour’.22 NHS Resolution told us that in its experience openness and transparency are the best way to prevent a claim in the first place.23 When questioned about inadequacies in the existing complaints system, NHS England told us it is very keen to do more to improve patient experience and is looking at alternative models for the NHS complaints system. When asked about how it is learning from complaints, NHS England told us that complaints are collected centrally in themes with around 200,000 to 250,000 reviewed each year nationally.24 NHS Resolution explained that it is also working across all areas locally with NHS trusts to identify complaint issues that might escalate into clinical negligence claims further down the line.25

From: Public Accounts Committee, 64th Report - Costs of clinical negligence (HC 1234), 30 January 2026

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 7 April 2026 (deadline 30 March 2026).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government agrees with the Committee's recommendation to set out an operational plan on clinical negligence, disagrees with others, and has some recommendations "under consideration".

  • It agrees to write to the Committee "by this Autumn" with its workplan, key milestones and likely areas of focus for reform, but "disagrees" with publishing David Lock KC's review, saying it has "no current plans" to publish a separate report.
  • It "disagrees" with estimating and tracking the costs of treating avoidable harm, stating it "would not be financially or logistically feasible", and "disagrees" with a new national data-sharing system, saying "there is already data sharing arrangements in place".
  • On maternity, it agrees with the recommendation to learn lessons. Baroness Amos has confirmed the independent investigation will publish its final report in June 2026, and a National Maternity and Neonatal Taskforce will develop a national action plan.
  • Alternative dispute mechanisms and fixed recoverable costs are "under consideration", and the government is "unable to commit" to the six-month timeframe for double recovery estimates. It will write to the Committee by Autumn 2026 on each.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error