Source · Select Committees · Public Accounts Committee

Recommendation 26

26

We asked whether, with hindsight and more time, it would have been possible to design...

Recommendation
We asked whether, with hindsight and more time, it would have been possible to design a scheme that would have had significantly less exposure to fraud and error than 61 Q104; Public Accounts Committee, Covid-19: Bounce Back Loan Scheme, Thirty-Third Report of Session 2019–21, HC 687, 16 December 2020, para 19 62 Public Accounts Committee, Covid-19: Bounce Back Loan Scheme, Thirty-Third Report of Session 2019–21, HC 687, 16 December 2020, para 6 63 Qq 22, 69, 89–90 64 Qq 89–90; C&AG’s Report, para 17 65 Comptroller & Auditor General, Support to businesses during a recession, Session 2009–2010, HC 490, 26 March 2010, para 18 66 Q 68 67 Q 91 68 Qq 10, 105 18 Bounce Back Loans Scheme: Follow-up the Scheme. The Department explained that a situation where it needs to introduce a support scheme with a 100% guarantee and achieve a fast disbursement would “probably be more infrequent than once-in-a-generation events”. However, it acknowledged that it would now be better prepared as it has better data sharing in place and can take advantage of counter-fraud measures like “duplicate flags” or the “HMRC turnover checks”.69 69 Qq 68, 70 Bounce Back Loans Scheme: Follow-up 19
Government Response

A response document is linked to this report, dated 2 September 2022. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document ↗