Source · Select Committees · Public Accounts Committee
Recommendation 2
2
Not Addressed
HM Treasury is not making full use of the spending levers it has at its...
Recommendation
HM Treasury is not making full use of the spending levers it has at its disposal to deliver a step change in the use of evaluation across government. We welcome the creation of the Evaluation Task Force and the increased emphasis on evaluation in the 2020 and 2021 Spending Reviews, whereby HM Treasury made greater use of its authority to set requirements for evaluation when it approved funding. However, we are disappointed that HM Treasury did not make use of these powers earlier, despite the NAO recommending this in 2013. HM Treasury’s final recourse is to withdraw funding or to reduce a department’s delegated authority limit if there is non-compliance with evaluation requirements. HM Treasury has not set up formal and standardised ways of tracking all spending review conditions across departments, including those related to evaluation. With few sanctions available to HM Treasury outside of the spending reviews, HM Treasury needs to make as much use of spending review conditions as it can. HM Treasury acknowledges that there is room for improvement in the quality and provision of evaluations across government despite its recent efforts. Recommendation: By November 2022, HM Treasury should set up a formal process for routinely tracking and following up on spending review settlement conditions relating to evaluation. HM Treasury should set out the range of interventions it will use if departments fail to meet the conditions.
Government Response Summary
The response does not address the recommendation of setting up a formal process for tracking spending review settlement conditions relating to evaluation, and instead discusses internal performance measures and consultations with the sector.
Government Response
Not Addressed
HM Government
Not Addressed
agree an aligned suite of internal performance measures which will help the department to hold the OfS to account better. 2.5 The OfS already consults the sector on its activity, including regular meetings with sector bodies, organising events for the sector and participating in their events, as well as engaging them through round tables and training sessions on regulatory issues. In response to the sector, the OfS has improved its regular communications with providers through regular mailings, pulling together information and resources, an approach welcomed by sector bodies. 2.6 The OfS has commissioned qualitative research with a wide range of providers to collate and assess the impact and understanding of its communication and interactions with individual universities and colleges. In all these interactions, the OfS aims to work in the interests of students whilst taking a risk based, proportionate approach.