Source · Select Committees · Public Accounts Committee

Recommendation 20

20 Accepted

It is widely believed across the waste sector that there has been a steady rise...

Recommendation
It is widely believed across the waste sector that there has been a steady rise in the involvement of organised crime groups over recent years.69 We heard from the Agency and HMRC of the challenges involved in taking such criminals to court, and how they can afford good legal teams.70 Criminal prosecutions require higher evidential standards than 61 Qq 23, 24 62 Q 48; GWC0004 (NFU England and Wales) 63 Q 47; GWC0007 (Suez Recycling and Recovery UK) 64 GWC0003 (Environmental Services Association) 65 Qq 49–50 66 Qq 65, 69–72 67 Qq 65, 68 68 Qq 69, 73 69 C&AG’s Report, para 14 70 Qq 46, 60, 65 16 Government actions to combat waste crime civil cases, and therefore investigations are more complex and difficult, compounded by the exponential growth in data from mobile phones and laptops that need to be examined as potential evidence.71
Government Response Summary
Defra, the Agency and HMRC should work with relevant bodies within the criminal justice system to develop a plan for making enforcement more effective across the full spectrum of waste crime, including how to speed the process up and consideration of whether the sentencing guidelines need strengthening.
Government Response Accepted
HM Government Accepted
4. PAC conclusion: The current sanctions are not effective in deterring people from committing waste crime. 4. PAC recommendation: Defra, the Agency and HMRC should work with relevant bodies within the criminal justice system to develop a plan for making enforcement more effective across the full spectrum of waste crime. This should include how to speed the process up and consideration of whether the sentencing guidelines need strengthening. 4.1 The government agrees with the Committee’s recommendation Recommendation implemented 4.2 The Sentencing Council is a statutory body responsible for issuing sentencing guidance for use by the Courts. It must consult those it considers appropriate in developing those guidelines. The Courts will make independent decisions on the sentences to hand down to convicted offenders and will refer to the sentencing guidelines to help them reach their decisions. 4.3 The government aims to be more effective by reducing the drivers for waste offending, preventing opportunities for offending and improving deterrents. The agency is now working further upstream to prevent crime and harm before it happens. The agency approach is more intelligence-led. The 80/20 rule is applied, focusing on the worst criminals and the biggest environmental harms; the agency takes a national approach, focusing on the biggest threats across the country. 4.4 In 2019, the Joint Unit for Waste Crime was also formed with a remit to identify, disrupt and deter waste crime. Members include Natural Resources Wales, the Scottish Environment Protection Agency, the Northern Ireland Environment Agency, the police, the National Crime Agency, HM Revenue & Customs and the British Transport Police. 4.5 The penalties for agency prosecutions have increased since the introduction of the sentencing guidelines which came into force in July 2014, and in the imposition of custodial sentences. The most serious waste offenders are made the subject of immediate or suspended custodial sentences and the agency sees a deterrent value in such sentences. 4.6 To support sentences that properly reflect the severity of smaller scale incidents, the department has worked with the National Fly-Tipping Prevention Group to produce a guide on how councils and others can present robust prosecutions. 4.7 The department intends to conduct new research into the effectiveness of the current enforcement regime for small scale fly-tipping. This work is anticipated to commence in early 2023.