Source · Select Committees · Public Accounts Committee
Recommendation 16
16
Rejected
We questioned the Treasury on the use of the terms “aspiration” and “ambition” in relation...
Conclusion
We questioned the Treasury on the use of the terms “aspiration” and “ambition” in relation to local audit reform measures.29 The Treasury stated that it has implemented all relevant legislation within its remit, but that it cannot undertake the responsibilities of local government on their behalf.30 MHCLG also clarified that no formal sanctions exist, but that a three-stage, communication-focused approach is being used to encourage compliance among local authorities.31
Government response summary AI-generated
The government stated it disagreed with the Committee’s conclusion regarding local audit, asserting it has a clear ambition to clear all backstop-related disclaimed opinions by the end of 2027-28 and has published a transition plan.
Summary of the government's response below — read the verbatim text to verify.
Government Response
Rejected
HM Government · verbatim extract
Rejected
3.1 The government agrees with the Committee’s recommendation. Recommendation implemented 3.2 MHCLG has written separately to the Committee alongside the Treasury Minute with the information requested. 3.3 The government does not agree with the Committee’s conclusion in relation to local audit. The government has a clear ambition to clear all backstop-related disclaimed opinions by the end of 2027-28 and has published a transition plan setting out the arrangements for the reformed local audit system to help meet this objective.
Read the full response on Parliament ↗