Select committee: Public Accounts Committee

Conclusion 13

74th Report - Environmental regulation Published 25 Mar 2026 Addressed to HM Treasury
Conclusion (the committee's words)
Defra’s approach to funding the regulators shows that Defra does not always appear to have considered the total costs and benefits of changes. For example, from 2018–19, Defra cut funding for inspections of non- permitted farms before increasing it again from 2020–21.30 Defra explained it has learned from the higher number of farm inspections and now better understands where risks are and where they are not, which it will use to focus future inspections. The Environment Agency told us, however, that it has only recently started to determine the best level of inspection for farming and water, and that it is yet to work out how best to target the inspections and how to use data from inspections effectively.31,32 Modernising IT systems and processes

From: Public Accounts Committee, 74th Report - Environmental regulation (HC 1687), 25 March 2026

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 1 June 2026 (deadline 25 May 2026).

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error