Select committee inquiry

Access to General Practice inquiry

Closed

Public Accounts Committee · Opened 14 December 2016 · Closed 4 January 2018

Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗

What the inquiry looked at

“A recently published National Audit Office investigation has found that the Department of Health and NHS England do have a high-level vision for improving patient access to general practice and have increased the funding available, but are seeking to extend access despite failing to provide consistent value for money from existing services. The Department has set objectives such as providing evening and weekend access for all patients and 5,000 extra doctors in general practice, both by 2020. However, they have not evaluated the cost-effectiveness and consequences of their objectives. The NAO's analysis suggests the minimum additional capacity required by the new commitment equates to £230 per appointment hour per 1,000 registered patients. In core contract hours the cost is an estimated £154. NHS England intends that the additional funding will be used to also cover transformation costs and deliver wider improvements in access, but has not currently set out how it will take assurance that the additional funding provides good value for money. The most commonly used contract is the General Medical Services contract, which stipulates that "core hours" are 8 am to 6.30 pm, Monday to Friday. Practices do not necessarily have to be open throughout these core hours, but they must provide essential services at times to meet the reasonable needs of their patients. The NAO found variations in practices' opening hours during these times. As at October 2015, some 46% of practices closed at some point during core hours. In particular, 18% closed at or before 3 pm on at least one weekday, although three-quarters (76%) of those practices that closed received additional funding in 2015–16 to provide access outside of core hours. Shorter opening hours are associated with poorer outcomes. The NAO report found that NHS England and Health Education England’s efforts to increase the GP workforce are at particular risk from falling retention, shortfalls in recruitment and increases in part-time working. The time taken to train clinical staff, and increasing demand, mean supplying sufficient numbers is challenging. Against a target of 3,250 GP training places in 2016–17, Health Education England only filled 3,019 (93%) places, although this was an increase from 2,769 in 2015–16. NHS England is supporting general practice to employ a wider staff mix but the incentives for practices to employ staff cost-effectively are not yet aligned.”

The committee's words, from the inquiry page on parliament.uk ↗.

What it found

In the committee's words, from the summary of 61st Report - Access to General Practice: progress review ↗

In March 2016 we reported our concerns that patients’ experience of contacting and accessing their general practices varied significantly between different groups of patients and between different practices. One year on, these concerns persist. The Department of Health (the Department) and NHS England have objectives to improve and extend access, and have made some effort to understand the demand for this extended access.

But they are moving ahead in rolling out extended hours without really understanding the level of access currently being provided or how to get the best from existing resources.

Last year we also expressed concern that staffing in general practice was not keeping pace with growing demand. Despite the government’s target to recruit 5,000 more GPs, the overall number of GPs has reduced in the last year, and problems with staff retention have continued. Health Education England has increased the number of trainee GPs recruited, but still did not manage to meet its recruitment target last year. NHS England and Health Education England have several initiatives in place to boost recruitment further, to make better use of other staff groups, and to ease workload and encourage staff to stay. However, they are pursuing these discrete initiatives without a credible plan for how to develop a cost-effective, sustainable workforce.

What the government said

No government response is linked to this report.

How the inquiry ran

Each dot is a dated item listed on this page, from the inquiry's opening on 14 December 2016 to its close on 4 January 2018.

  1. Oral evidence 9 Mar 2017
  2. Report 27 Apr 2017

What it recommended

The committee's recommendations are not listed here yet. Read them in 61st Report - Access to General Practice: progress review ↗ on parliament.uk.

Evidence

Oral evidence sessions 1