The Great Western Railway inquiry
Closed
What the inquiry looked at
“The Department for Transport and Network Rail plan to improve passenger services on the Great Western Main Line through infrastructure improvements and the introduction of new trains. The Department for Transport is responsible for funding and sponsoring the programme, while Network Rail is responsible for carrying out infrastructure works to modernise the route. Electrification of the route between Maidenhead and Cardiff is the largest component of the route modernisation. National Audit Office report The National Audit Office (NAO) are shortly due to publish their first report into the Great Western Route Modernisation, though they have previously prepared a Memorandum for the Committee of Public Accounts on the 2014–2019 rail investment programme as a whole. The NAO's upcoming report will focus on how well the Department and Network Rail planned the programme from the outset, the extent to which previous programme management issues have been addressed, and how the Department and Network Rail are managing the remaining risks to value for money.”
The committee's words, from the inquiry page on parliament.uk ↗.
What it found
We reported in November 2015 on the staggering and unacceptable increase in the estimated costs of the Great Western Main Line electrification programme which rose by £1.2 billion in the space of a year. The extent of the serious failings in the Department for Transport’s (the Department’s) and Network Rail’s management of the Great Western modernisation programme which led to these cost overruns and a delay to completion of up to three years are now clearer. Both the Department and Network Rail accept that there were significant failings in the design, planning and cost-estimating of the programme. The case for electrification and new trains were seen as two linked programmes, rather than being managed as a whole and the accountability arrangements put in place were overly complex and failed to provide the assurance the Department needed to be an effective client of Network Rail. The serious management failings evident in this programme raise concerns about the Department and Network Rail’s ability to manage similar projects in the future, such as the planned electrification schemes on Midland Main Line and TransPennine routes. The Department’s claim that many of the passenger benefits of electrification can be obtained without electrifying the whole route raises questions about whether full electrification is the most appropriate way to achieve benefits for passengers, and value for money for taxpayers. But whilst the Department is taking this optimistic view this cannot detract from the £330m additional costs that the delays to electrification will incur.
What the government said
No government response is linked to this report.
How the inquiry ran
Each dot is a dated item listed on this page, from the inquiry's opening on 24 October 2016 to its close on 4 January 2018.
- Oral evidence 14 Dec 2016
- Report 3 Mar 2017
What it recommended
The committee's recommendations are not listed here yet. Read them in 44th Report - Modernising the Great Western Railway ↗ on parliament.uk.
Evidence
Oral evidence sessions 1
- 14 Dec 2016No witnesses recordedparliament.uk ↗