Corporate Tax Deals inquiry
Closed
What the inquiry looked at
“Transparent, predictable and fair taxation is at the core of our public finances. The Government has a responsibility to assess and collect tax due from all taxpayers, without fear or favour, and taxpayers should pay all that tax which is due. In 2012, the Public Accounts Committee looked at HMRC's accounts, and of principal concern to the inquiry was the corporation tax paid by multinational companies. The hearings held showed that international companies were able to exploit national and international tax structures to minimise corporation tax on the economic activity they conducted in the UK. In the Public Accounts Committee report published in November 2012, Members considered that these companies were not paying their fair share and that this practice was widespread. They concluded that HMRC was not taking sufficiently aggressive action to assess and collect the appropriate amount of corporation tax from these multinationals. Members reported that because companies did not pay their fair share of tax, other taxpayers were having to pay more. Both HMRC and corporate taxpayers were therefore failing to meet the legitimate public expectations from the tax system. Previous evidence "unconvincing" and "evasive" In the 2012 inquiry, the Public Accounts Committee took evidence from multinational companies and HMRC to understand how successful companies with huge operations in the UK pay little or no corporation tax. The evidence received was unconvincing, and in some cases evasive. On Friday 22 January 2016, it was reported that Google had agreed to pay £130m in back taxes after an open audit of its accounts by the UK tax authorities. The payment covers money owed since 2005 and follows a six year inquiry by HMRC. Google is one of several multinational companies to be have been accused of avoiding tax, in spite of making billions of pounds of sales in Britain. Matt Brittin, head of Google Europe, told the BBC: "Today we announced that we are going to be paying more tax in the UK. The rules are changing internationally and the UK government is taking the lead in applying those rules so we'll be changing what we are doing here. We want to ensure that we pay the right amount of tax."”
The committee's words, from the inquiry page on parliament.uk ↗.
What it found
A six year investigation by HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) has resulted in Google paying a further £130 million to settle its corporation tax liabilities over the last 10 years.
This vindicates the previous Committee’s concerns in 2012 and 2013 that Google did not appear to be paying the full tax it owed in the UK. However, in the absence of full transparency over the details of this settlement and how it was reached we cannot judge whether it is fair to taxpayers. The sum paid by Google seems disproportionately small when compared with the size of Google’s business in the UK, reinforcing our concerns that the rules governing where corporation tax is paid by multinational companies do not produce a fair outcome. Google’s stated desire for greater tax simplicity and transparency is at odds with the complex operational structure it has created which appears to be directed at minimising its tax liabilities. Google admits that this structure will not change as a result of this settlement.
What the government said
No government response is linked to this report.
How the inquiry ran
Each dot is a dated item listed on this page, from the inquiry's opening on 28 January 2016 to 8 July 2016.
- Oral evidence 11 Feb 2016
- Report 24 Feb 2016
- Correspondence 12 letters
What it recommended
The committee's recommendations are not listed here yet. Read them in 25th Report - Corporate tax settlements ↗ on parliament.uk.
Evidence
Oral evidence sessions 1
- 11 Feb 2016No witnesses recordedparliament.uk ↗
Correspondence 12 letters
- 8 Jul 2016Evelyn Regner, Member of the TAXE2 Committee Report on Tax Avoidance, European Parliament, Germany
- 28 Jun 2016Open letter signed by Petr Gazdík, Deputy Chairman, Chamber of Deputies, Czech Republic
- 28 Jun 2016Open letter signed by Steven van Weyenberg, Member, Finance Committee, the Netherlands
- 28 Jun 2016Open letter signed by Professor Rumen Gechev, Deputy Chairperson, Budget and Finance Committee, Bulgaria
- 28 Jun 2016Open letter signed by Hans Olav Syversen, Chair, Finance Committee, Norway
- 28 Jun 2016Open letter signed by Timo Kalli, Chair, Finance Committee, Finland
- 28 Jun 2016Open letter signed by Michael Theurer, Rapporteur of the TAXE2 Committee Report on Tax Avoidance, European Parliament, Germany
- 28 Jun 2016Open letter signed by Ladislav Kamenický, Chair, Committee on Finance and Budget, Slovakia
- 28 Jun 2016Open letter signed by Ingrid Arndt-Brauer, Chair, Finance Committee, Germany
- 28 Jun 2016Open letter signed by Wouter Koolmees, Member, Finance Committee, the Netherlands
- 28 Jun 2016Open letter signed by Burány Sándor, Chair, Committee on the Budget, Hungary
- 28 Jun 2016Open letter signed by Arnold Merkies, Member, Finance Committee, the Netherlands