Delivering Major Projects in Government inquiry
Closed
What the inquiry looked at
“Major government programmes have an estimated whole-life cost of at least £518 billion. They include highly complex major infrastructure projects and high-risk service transformation programmes. Historically the track record in delivery is poor. Delivering these projects is likely to become even more difficult due to: austerity; skills shortages; the financing required; and navigating dynamic operating environments characterised by constant technological change. This inquiry will look to assess the scale of challenge in project delivery; whether performance can be said to be improving; and what is being done in the centre and in departments to improve performance. Much of the work will focus on the role of the Major Projects Authority and the information provided in the MPA’s Annual Report.”
The committee's words, from the inquiry page on parliament.uk ↗.
What it found
We have supported the Major Projects Authority’s efforts to improve project delivery in government and recognise the steps it has taken to strengthen project assurance, improve transparency, and introduce project leadership training. But it is disappointing that after nearly 5 years we cannot see more tangible signs of what impact these initiatives have had. Moreover, there are still big challenges ahead. The Major Projects Authority rated 34% of the government’s major projects as either ‘red’ or ‘amber-red’ at June 2015, meaning that successful delivery is unachievable or in doubt unless action is taken. For the projects due to deliver in the next 5 years, 35% are rated as red or amber-red. In this demanding environment, it is important that there is a body within government which challenges departments about their plans and implementation of projects. We are concerned that the merger of the Major Projects Authority and Infrastructure UK risks the new body (the Infrastructure and Projects Authority) becoming too much of a champion for government projects, at the expense of its vital role in challenging government performance.
What the government said
No government response is linked to this report.
How the inquiry ran
Each dot is a dated item listed on this page, from the inquiry's opening on 4 January 2016 to its close on 12 May 2016.
- Oral evidence 20 Jan 2016
- Report 18 Mar 2016
What it recommended
The committee's recommendations are not listed here yet. Read them in 31st Report - Delivering major projects in government ↗ on parliament.uk.
Evidence
Oral evidence sessions 1
- 20 Jan 2016No witnesses recordedparliament.uk ↗