Reform of the rail franchising programme inquiry
Closed
What the inquiry looked at
“On 3 October 2012, the Department for Transport cancelled its competition for the InterCity West Coast franchise due to errors in the procurement process. The Committee's inquiry into the matter concluded that the Department's failure to properly manage the competition would cost taxpayers at least £50 million. The Department subsequently paused three further franchise competitions. In addition to the Committee's and NAO's reports on the cancellation of the InterCity West Coast competition, Sam Laidlaw (a then Departmental Non-Executive Director) led an inquiry into the events. These reports highlighted a number of weaknesses including: clarity of objectives and transparency of information timetables for franchise competitions senior level oversight, governance and assurance commercial and project management capacity and capability This inquiry looks at the Department’s response to the main recommendations from those reports and the effectiveness of its programme management in its rail franchising programme.”
The committee's words, from the inquiry page on parliament.uk ↗.
What it found
The last time we discussed rail franchising was in 2012, in the wake of the collapsed competition for the InterCity West Coast franchise. We are encouraged that, since then, the Department for Transport (the Department) has strengthened its capability to let franchises, but there are still gaps in its ability to then manage the contracts effectively.
The Department’s increased focus on the passenger experience is also welcome, but it is unclear when passengers themselves will actually see the benefits. Furthermore, the Department has not yet developed the partnerships with operators that are required to support innovation, improve efficiency and improve services for passengers.
Successful rail franchising depends on strong interest from the market and effective competition but there are barriers to entry to the UK market and the possibility that current participants in the market may drop out. Any reduction to the current level of competition is a major risk to securing value for money for the taxpayer.
Perhaps the biggest challenge facing the Department is to manage the complex interdependencies between passenger rail franchises, the infrastructure that train services run on and the introduction of new fleets of trains to the network. Uncertainty about infrastructure work has resulted in delays to franchise competitions and the Department will have to rely on potentially expensive changes to franchises during the life of contracts. The Department’s role is to provide a strategic lead for the complex rail system but it has not yet shown that it has embraced this role. It needs to provide a coherent strategic vision and stronger leadership to ensure that the investment decisions it makes now do not result in increased costs in the long term.
What the government said
No government response is linked to this report.
How the inquiry ran
Each dot is a dated item listed on this page, from the inquiry's opening on 11 November 2015 to 18 July 2016.
- Oral evidence 2 Dec 2015
- Report 12 Feb 2016
- Correspondence 18 Jul 2016
What it recommended
The committee's recommendations are not listed here yet. Read them in 21st Report - Reform of the rail franchising programme ↗ on parliament.uk.
Evidence
Oral evidence sessions 1
- 2 Dec 2015No witnesses recordedparliament.uk ↗