Tax avoidance: the role of large accountancy firms: follow-up
Closed
What the inquiry looked at
“The Committee first took evidence on tax avoidance from PricewaterhouseCoopers in January 2013 alongside Deloitte, Ernst and Young and KPMG. The Committee’s report on the role of large accountancy firms noted that the four firms "insisted that they no longer sell the type of very aggressive avoidance schemes that they sold ten years ago. While this may be the case, we believe they have simply moved to advising on other forms of tax avoidance which are profitable for their clients; such as the complex operating models they offer to major corporate clients to minimise tax by exploiting the lowest international tax rates." In light of recent information on tax agreements brokered by PwC between multinational corporations and the Luxembourg tax authorities, the Committee have recalled PwC to review that firm’s role in tax avoidance schemes. Further information Public Accounts Committee report: tax avoidance: the role of large accountancy firms (PDF 525 KB)”
The committee's words, from the inquiry page on parliament.uk ↗.
What it found
Large accountancy firms advise multinational companies on complex strategies and contrived structures which do not reflect the substance of their businesses and are instead designed to avoid tax. In light of the publication of leaked documents detailing some of the tax advice it has given to its multinational clients, we took evidence from PriceWaterhouseCoopers (PwC). PwC did not convince us that its widespread promotion of schemes to numerous clients, based on artificially diverting profits to Luxembourg through intra-company loans, constituted anything other than the promotion of tax avoidance on an industrial scale. The fact that PwC’s promotion of these schemes is permitted by its own code of conduct is clear evidence that Government needs to take a more active role in regulating the tax industry, as it evidently cannot be trusted to regulate itself. In particular, HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) needs to do more to challenge the nature of the advice being given by accountancy firms to their clients, ensure that tax liabilities reflect the substance of where companies conduct their business, and introduce a new code of conduct for all tax advisers. Unless HMRC takes urgent action, this irresponsible activity will go unchecked, causing harm to both the public finances and the reputations of the companies involved.
What the government said
The government responded on 27 March 2015.
Read the government's response ↗ Read the report ↗ Report an error
How the inquiry ran
Each dot is a dated item listed on this page, from the inquiry's opening on 28 November 2014 to 27 March 2015.
- Oral evidence 8 Dec 2014
- Report 6 Feb 2015
- Government response 27 Mar 2015
What it recommended
The committee's recommendations are not listed here yet. Read them in 38th Report - Tax avoidance: the role of large accountancy firms (follow-up) ↗ on parliament.uk.
Evidence
Oral evidence sessions 1
- 8 Dec 2014No witnesses recordedparliament.uk ↗