Select Committee · Public Accounts Committee

Improving family court services for children

Status: Closed Opened: 6 May 2025 Closed: 15 Dec 2025 5 recommendations 25 conclusions 1 report

In 2023, more than 130,000 children were involved in the family court system. A large part of family courts’ work is dealing with disputes over children, such as deciding which parent a child should live with or whether a child should be taken into care for their protection.. The system relies on input from a …

Reports

1 report
Title HC No. Published Items Response
45th Report - Improving family court services for children HC 883 12 Sep 2025 30 Responded

Recommendations & Conclusions

30 items
2 Recommendation 45th Report - Improving family court se… Accepted

Assess and report on improving accountability for family justice system by December 2025.

The family justice system is complex, but excessive fragmentation hinders transparency, leading to poor accountability for service improvement and overall performance. The family justice system involves many organisations across government and the independent judiciary. There is no single body accountable for overall system performance, including delivery of the statutory time …

Government response. The government accepted the recommendation, agreeing to assess current accountability arrangements for family justice and report back to the Committee by December 2025 with plans for improvements and better support for Family Justice Boards.
HM Treasury
3 Recommendation 45th Report - Improving family court se… Accepted

Improve efficiency in family justice processes and clarify £2 billion social care investment.

There are inefficiencies in systems and processes that worsen experiences and outcomes for children and families, making it harder to achieve best value for money. Around 32% of public law cases have at least one hearing cancelled before the hearing takes place, leading to delays and wasted resources. Not only …

Government response. The government agrees to improve efficiency across the family justice system. It will outline implications of inefficiency assessments and next steps in an April 2026 strategy, commit over £6 million to support legal services and alternative resolutions, and leverage £2 …
HM Treasury
4 Recommendation 45th Report - Improving family court se… Accepted

Clarify required family court capacity and plans to resolve judge and social worker shortages.

Shortages in the number of district judges and social workers are contributing to delays, and to significant regional differences in timeliness of resolving cases. There are wide variations in durations of cases; for example, in December 2024, the average duration for public law cases was 24 weeks in Wales but …

Government response. The government accepts the recommendation, stating it has already increased judicial capacity, assesses family court capacity annually, and expects judicial recruitment campaign outcomes by Spring 2026. It further details ongoing investments by the DfE to address social worker shortages, including …
HM Treasury
5 Recommendation 45th Report - Improving family court se… Accepted

Set out a joined-up data and evidence strategy for family justice within six months.

MoJ and DfE do not have the data they need to fully understand the reasons for poor performance and design well targeted improvements. There remain significant gaps in family justice data. HMCTS does not collect enough demographic information on children, and there are no data on outcomes for different user …

Government response. The government accepts the recommendation, stating Cafcass Cymru will outline plans for a joined-up data and evidence strategy in 2026-2027 to improve data sharing, address gaps, track outcomes, and understand causes of delay. This includes piloting a unique child identifier …
HM Treasury
6 Recommendation 45th Report - Improving family court se… Deferred

Publish plan and timeline for wider Pathfinder rollout, assessing funding reallocation within 12 months.

‘Pathfinder’ pilots present an opportunity to improve private law performance, but MoJ has not yet made necessary preparations to roll the pilot out nationally. The MoJ’s ‘Pathfinder’ pilot is now rolled out across six family court areas, with plans for another four areas. Initial evaluations suggest the new model improves …

Government response. The government agrees with the recommendation to publish a plan and timeline for the wider rollout of Pathfinder, but defers its publication until after the conclusion of departmental funding decisions through the Spending Review 2026-2027 and the approval of the …
HM Treasury
1 Conclusion 45th Report - Improving family court se… Not Addressed

Committee took evidence on improving family court services for children.

On the basis of a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, we took evidence from the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), Department for Education (DfE), HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) and the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass) on improving family court services for children.1

Government response. The government's response outlines plans for improving timeliness in family justice, developing a cross-system strategy by April 2026, and reviewing performance indicators, but this does not address the content of the committee's introductory conclusion.
HM Treasury
7 Conclusion 45th Report - Improving family court se…

Family justice backlog remains large despite recent decrease from 2021 peak.

Family justice faced rising demand before the COVID-19 pandemic, with public law receipts peaking in 2017 at 19,389, while private law receipts peaked in 2020 at 55,711. The backlog of cases increased by 2021 and cases were taking longer to settle.8 The number of outstanding cases remains large, but has …

HM Treasury
8 Conclusion 45th Report - Improving family court se…

Mean family law case durations remain high with significant regional variations.

In 2024, the mean durations of public law and private law cases were 36 and 41 weeks respectively, significantly higher than the 27 weeks and 26 weeks on average in 2018.10 MoJ and HMCTS told us that the average duration for private and public law cases has reduced by about …

HM Treasury
9 Conclusion 45th Report - Improving family court se…

Thousands of children's family law cases persist beyond 100-week duration.

In December 2024, there were still over 4,000 children involved in public and private law proceedings which had been open for over 100 weeks.14 MoJ told us that by the end of March 2025, the number of those waiting for over 100 weeks had reduced by 48% for public law …

HM Treasury
10 Conclusion 45th Report - Improving family court se…

Statutory 26-week public law case deadline consistently unmet since 2014.

Since 2014, there has been a statutory requirement that most public law cases should be completed within 26 weeks, but this statutory deadline has never been met.16 There is no equivalent statutory timeline for private law. For 2024–25, four of the five priority indicators set by the FJB on improving …

HM Treasury
11 Conclusion 45th Report - Improving family court se…

Family justice system lacks single accountability due to dispersed responsibilities.

Successful delivery of services requires strong accountability with clear roles and responsibilities. Responsibilities for family justice are dispersed across many organisations across government and there is no single body accountable for overall performance. Complex and fragmented funding arrangements and information flows for family justice make accountability more challenging.18 Witnesses agreed …

HM Treasury
12 Conclusion 45th Report - Improving family court se…

Family Justice Board suffers infrequent meetings and high ministerial chair turnover.

The ministerial-led FJB was established to help organisations involved in family justice work together effectively, to improve performance and hold organisations to account internally. Although it aimed to meet quarterly, this group only met on average 2.5 times per year over the period June 2018 to December 2024. Frequent turnover …

HM Treasury
13 Conclusion 45th Report - Improving family court se…

Absence of shared strategy for family justice system across departments.

There is no shared strategy for the whole system across all the departments involved. DfE told us that there is a published strategy document for children’s social care, and that the FJB has shared objectives and targets. MoJ and DfE accepted, however, that they could put more narrative and clarity …

HM Treasury
15 Conclusion 45th Report - Improving family court se…

Family court processes plagued by inefficiencies, poor data quality and administrative errors.

We asked the witnesses what they were going to do to address a range of inefficiencies in family court processes identified by the NAO. For example, poor quality information input by applicants was causing rework and delays, although there was no collective understanding of how often this occurs. The NAO …

HM Treasury
16 Conclusion 45th Report - Improving family court se…

Public law cases suffer delays from cancelled hearings and excessive hearing numbers.

In public law, 32% of cases had at least one hearing cancelled on the day, which contributes to delays.27 HMCTS told us that the main reason cases are cancelled or adjourned, in over 25% of cases, is non-compliance with what the judge has ordered parties to do. Sometimes this is …

HM Treasury
17 Conclusion 45th Report - Improving family court se…

Increasing numbers of unrepresented litigants affect family court efficiency, despite data limitations.

The proportion of cases where neither party was represented in family courts was 39% in 2024, three times that in 2013.31 Many stakeholders who provided written submissions told us that people going through legal disputes without legal representation (litigants in person), often feel overwhelmed by the family court process, including …

HM Treasury
18 Conclusion 45th Report - Improving family court se…

Mediation Information Assessment Meeting attendance remains low despite voucher scheme.

Keeping cases out of the courts, where possible, can be less contentious and lead to quicker settlements, saving money and benefiting children.36 Both MoJ and DfE are taking measures to keep more cases out of court that do not need to be there, such as through family group decision- making …

HM Treasury
19 Conclusion 45th Report - Improving family court se…

New investment in children's social care aims to reduce family court cases.

DfE told us its major contribution to the overall system is to reduce the flow of cases to family courts. It told us that successive governments have under-invested in children’s social care but the Spending Review in June this year announced over £2 billion of new investment in Children’s social …

HM Treasury
21 Conclusion 45th Report - Improving family court se…

Case complexity, administrative landscape, and staff shortages contribute to London court delays.

MoJ and HMCTS told us that cases can take longer in London partly because there are more complicated cases, often with international dimensions. There is also a complicated administrative landscape with 33 different local authorities all doing things differently.44 HMCTS and Cafcass added that shortages in district judges and social …

HM Treasury
22 Conclusion 45th Report - Improving family court se…

Overall capacity requirements for the family justice system caseload remain undefined.

The capacity required to manage the caseload efficiently on a timely basis, both at a national level, and in each part of the country, has not been set out.46 MoJ argued that there is more than enough capacity in the system overall to meet demand, on the grounds that backlogs …

HM Treasury
23 Conclusion 45th Report - Improving family court se…

No overall assessment exists for prioritising efforts to reduce family justice delays.

An overall assessment of the drivers of performance is important to support the system to focus on areas most likely to secure improvements. A whole-system approach is needed to deliver outcomes no individual body can achieve alone.50 MoJ told us that capacity, demand, case complexity and productivity all drive the …

HM Treasury
24 Conclusion 45th Report - Improving family court se…

Significant gaps and quality issues exist in family justice data collection.

There are significant gaps in family justice data. These data gaps include, for example, demographic information on children and their families; data on outcomes for children; and data on the prevalence of domestic abuse in private law cases.56 There are also issues with the quality of family courts data collected. …

HM Treasury
25 Conclusion 45th Report - Improving family court se… Acknowledged

Lack of a joined-up data plan hinders understanding of outcomes for children.

We asked MoJ and DfE why the system was not working as well as it should, given that better data sharing should allow improvements, and whether this was evidence of complacency.58 Delays in cases weigh heavily on children, in particular, domestic abuse victims.59 Gaps in the data mean that MoJ …

Government response. Acknowledges delays, data gaps, and differing data collection methods, and the potential of the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill.
HM Treasury
26 Conclusion 45th Report - Improving family court se… Acknowledged

Total cost of the family justice system remains unknown to the MoJ.

MoJ told us that there are separate accounting officers for each part of the system, and that each could account for the costs for which they were responsible.62 MoJ accepted, however, that they did not know the cost of the family justice system in totality, including spending by local authorities.63 …

Government response. Acknowledges the MoJ's statement about separate accounting officers and the lack of knowledge regarding the total cost of the family justice system, including local authority spending.
HM Treasury
27 Conclusion 45th Report - Improving family court se… Not Addressed

Pathfinder scheme pilots show improved experiences for domestic abuse victims and reduced case durations.

MoJ told us that it has been piloting a new model for private law through the ‘Pathfinder’ scheme, the aim of which was to improve experience for victims of domestic abuse by taking a whole system approach to improving services. Key features of the initiative include: 58 Q 39 59 …

Government response. The government response contains no relevant content.
HM Treasury
28 Conclusion 45th Report - Improving family court se… Acknowledged

Pathfinder scheme rollout requires significant funding reallocation for increased social worker and Cafcass involvement.

The new model reduces the number of court hearings and redistributes costs across the system.69 Evaluations from the two early pilots found that costs for local authorities more than doubled as social workers were involved in more cases, while the judicial cost halved due to a reduced number of hearings.70 …

Government response. Acknowledges the cost redistribution of the new model and the need for reallocation of funding to support Cafcass and local authority social workers.
HM Treasury
29 Conclusion 45th Report - Improving family court se… Acknowledged

Rollout of the Pathfinder model for private law remains significantly slow

MoJ told us that progress with improving timeliness for private law, including in London, will depend on the speed with which it rolls out the Pathfinder model.72 However, despite positive evaluations, wide stakeholder support, and the potential to improve timeliness, progress in rolling out the new model is slow. Pathfinder …

Government response. Acknowledges the progress of the Pathfinder model roll-out depends on funding and preparatory work.
HM Treasury
30 Conclusion 45th Report - Improving family court se… Not Addressed

Lack of a comprehensive plan for Pathfinder model's wider adoption by MoJ

MoJ has not set out a plan for its wider adoption, including assessment of what funding will be required, how it is going to work with partners to ensure that resources are available and realigned, or setting a timetable. MoJ told us that it would now develop a plan for …

Government response. The government response contains no relevant content.
HM Treasury

Oral evidence sessions

1 session
Date Witnesses
23 Jun 2025 Amy Rees CB · Ministry of Justice, Fran Oram · Department for Education, Jacky Tiotto · CAFCASS, Luke Taylor · Centre for Social Justice (CSJ), Nick Goodwin · HMCTS View ↗

Correspondence

1 letter
DateDirectionTitle
14 Jul 2025 To cttee Letter from the Chief Executive of HM Courts and Tribunals Service relating to …