Select committee inquiry
Child Trust Funds
Closed
What the inquiry looked at
“A Child Trust Fund (CTF) is a long-term tax-free savings account for children born between 1 September 2002 and 2 January 2011, which they can access when they turn 18. The government paid more than £2 billion into CTFs for 6.3 million children born during this period. Most children received around £250 each from the government at the time their CTF was started, while those from low-income families or in local authority care received an additional £250. But the NAO has said in its report hundreds of millions of pounds in Child Trust Funds (CTFs) set up by the government between 2005 and 2011 to help young people financially at the start of their adult lives has not yet been claimed. Dame Meg Hillier MP, Chair of the Committee of Public Accounts, commenting on the NAO’s finding, said: “HMRC have left £2 billion of taxpayers’ money sitting in Child Trust Funds for years while the organisations looking after the funds earned millions from them, yet HMRC does not know how many young people have lost track of their money. “Its latest figures show almost £400 million had yet to be claimed, which in a cost-of-living crisis could be a vital lifeline to young people, particularly those from low-income backgrounds. “HMRC needs to take Child Trust Funds off the backburner and proactively help reunite young people with their funds.” The Committee will question senior officials at HMRC and executives at The Share Foundation. If you have relevant evidence to inform the Committee’s questioning please submit it here by 23:59 on Wednesday 3 May. Please have a look at the requirements for written evidence submissions and note the Committee cannot accept as evidence material that has been published elsewhere.”
The committee's words, from the inquiry page on parliament.uk ↗.
What it found
In the committee's words, from the summary of Sixty-Seventh Report - Child Trust Funds ↗
Billions of pounds are sitting in the Child Trust Fund accounts of millions of young people currently aged 12 to 20. The value of unclaimed accounts is potentially over £1.7 billion, with a large part of it likely to have been forgotten about by everyone except the financial institutions profiting from it. A long time has elapsed since the Child Trust Fund scheme was set up and closed to new entrants and it is no longer a government priority. We heard from The Share Foundation on how Child Trust Funds can greatly help young people, particularly those from less wealthy backgrounds, but HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) has failed to apply sufficient effort to getting the most from the government’s significant investment in the scheme.
The government put £2 billion into Child Trust Funds, which are tax-free savings accounts, for over 6 million children, with the laudable aims of giving all young people a pot of money when they reach 18, promoting financial literacy and teaching good savings habits. HMRC managed the setting up of the accounts well and transferred the funding to the scheme effectively. However, once the bulk of its administrative involvement ended in the early 2010s, it failed to plan for the long term. Several government departments have a role in making the scheme succeed, but HMRC has failed to coordinate efforts and has made no attempt to promote the scheme’s wider objectives. Consequently, much less has been achieved from the government’s £2 billion investment than could have been possible. HMRC has little corporate memory or evidence of real learning from the scheme and has no intention of re-evaluating its future.
According to the trade association representing the providers of Child Trust Funds, in Spring 2023, 42% of 18-to-20-year-olds—almost a million young adults—had not claimed their savings. While many may have chosen not to claim it yet, it is likely that many may not know about the accounts or have lost track of them. A high proportion of these accounts are likely to belong to young people from low-income backgrounds, those who need it most. Providers are experiencing difficulties contacting many account holders and HMRC is not doing enough to help them. Furthermore, the families of young adults without mental capacity are finding it costly and complicated to access their Child Trust Funds via the Court of Protection and its equivalents. Young people’s legal rights are paramount, but HMRC as advocate for the scheme has a responsibility to work with the Ministry of Justice and its equivalents in the home nations to find a less daunting process.
What the government said
The government responded on 24 September 2023. The deadline was 26 September 2023.
Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response.
The government agrees with most of the Committee's recommendations on Child Trust Funds, but disagrees with the recommendation that HMRC should act immediately to address all four of the scheme's policy objectives.
- On finding and contacting young people with unclaimed accounts, the government agrees. HMRC says it is "confident that its activities are sufficient and proportionate" but will explore further ways with partners to help people trace accounts, "for adoption in 2024-25".
- The government disagrees with the recommendation to act immediately on all four policy objectives. It believes the "existing policy framework of supporting and encouraging people of all incomes and at all stages of life to save is the right one".
- On more timely data, the government agrees, with a target implementation date of Summer 2024. HMRC "anticipates" statistics up to tax year 2023 to 2024 will be published by then.
- On evaluating the scheme, the government agrees, with a target implementation date of Summer 2025. It says any plan must be "carefully considered and proportionate", with a more detailed plan "formalised in Winter 2023".
Read the government's response ↗ Read the report ↗ Report an error
How the inquiry ran
Each dot is a dated item listed on this page, from the inquiry's opening on 29 March 2023 to 26 September 2023. The dashed mark is the deadline Parliament records for the government's response.
- Oral evidence 18 May 2023
- Report 26 Jul 2023
- Government response 24 Sep 2023
- Correspondence 19 Jun 2023
What it recommended 2 recommendations · 24 conclusions
2Incentivise Child Trust Fund providers to contact young people and charge fair, proportionate fees
Concluded (the committee's words)
Providers are charging fees for passively managing many Child Trust Funds and some could do more to connect young adults with their accounts. Providers can charge fees up to a cap of 1.5% per year on ‘stakeholder’ accounts, the most common type of Child Trust Fund account, which equates to nearly £30 per year on a typical account and up to £100 million a year across all accounts. The Share Foundation described the charges as “very high indeed for fund management”, but HMRC claimed the charges are less than the annual growth of these investments. Providers are making even more money from some Child Trust Funds in other ways, for example, other types of Child Trust Fund have no cap on fees. The Share Foundation described a case in which a provider had asked the charity to pay £20 for a single account statement, which it declined to do. In many cases, providers are likely to be incurring very few costs from managing Child Trust Funds and to be making profits off savings mostly composed of government money. We heard that four providers have actively engaged with the Tracing Group—a commercial service for tracing the owners of dormant accounts—to set up a Child Trust Fund register. However, some providers are not doing enough to link up forgotten accounts with their owners. 6 Child Trust Funds Recommendation 2: HMRC should work in partnership with other parts of government to ensure that all providers are incentivised to establish contact with all young people whose Child Trust Funds they manage, and so that they earn fair fees, proportionate to their level of activity.
3Set out steps and statistics to ease Child Trust Fund access for young people lacking mental capacity
Recommended (the committee's words)
The Child Trust Fund scheme is not easily accessible for the families and carers of children and young people lacking mental capacity. The Ministry of Justice estimates that between 63,000 and 126,000 young people may not have the mental capacity to access and manage their matured Child Trust Fund when they reach adulthood. Instead, their family or carer must apply for legal authority to access and manage it on their behalf. However, the Court of Protection (covering England and Wales) approved only 15 such applications during 2021. Financial deputyship rules in Scotland and Northern Ireland are comparable to the rules in England and Wales, meaning similar issues are likely to have arisen. Fees are waived if families are only applying to access a Child Trust Fund but there are other barriers – we heard examples of a six-page GP letter being needed as part of the process, and the Downs Syndrome Association told us that low awareness about banking safeguards among parents it supports is a barrier to accessing their children’s Child Trust Funds. HMRC emphasised to us that the owners of matured Child Trust Funds are adults, and the law needs to protect their interests. Providers, the Ministry of Justice and HMRC are aware of the issue. HMRC said its guidance explains what people need to do. Some providers have, at their own risk, allowed families of young people without capacity to access funds in a Child Trust Fund up to £5,000. Recommendation 3a: In its Treasury Minute response, the government should set out what steps different bodies, including the Ministry of Justice and its equivalents in the home nations, are taking to help the families of young people who lack mental capacity to access their Child Trust Funds without excessive bureaucracy and cost. b) the government should include in the response statistics on how many people have used, successfully or otherwise, the current options available in each nation and set out the impact of the specific steps the govern
4Require HMRC to immediately maximise Child Trust Fund benefits and assess similar future savings schemes.
Recommended (the committee's words)
The objectives of the Child Trust Fund policy have not been achieved, but there is still time for HMRC to act. After establishing the scheme, HMRC showed little interest in achieving the wider objectives planned from government’s £2 billion investment. It regards the Child Trust Fund policy as having ended in 2011 when the new government closed the scheme to new entrants, despite the scheme being very much live and most accounts yet to mature. Its focus has been on raising awareness of Child Trust Funds and not on the other policy objectives. Disappointingly, the scheme has not been used to support young people’s financial education and improve financial literacy. The Share Foundation believes that only about 25% of students leave school saying that they have been adequately prepared in financial awareness. The duty to implement the policy was not fully HMRC’s but it did not establish the partnerships with other departments and organisations needed to implement and achieve the policy’s objectives. HM Treasury has not given HMRC dedicated funding for the scheme, nor supported it to do more with Child Trust Child Trust Funds 7 Funds. We are concerned that Child Trust Funds will become another example of a legacy financial product that is not given the necessary attention by government to succeed against its aims over the long term. Recommendation 4: HMRC should: a) act immediately to ensure that the most is made from the Child Trust Fund scheme. In its Treasury Minute response, it should set out how it will work with other government departments, including DfE, the MoJ and HMT, and other organisations to plan and implement activity which addresses all four of the Child Trust Fund policy’s objectives. b) make an assessment of whether similar issues are likely to affect other tax- free savings accounts the government is currently planning, promoting, and/or making contributions towards, such as lifetime ISAs and Junior ISAs for children in care. The government should wo
5HMRC does not collect the data from providers needed to plan timely action to improve...
Concluded (the committee's words)
HMRC does not collect the data from providers needed to plan timely action to improve young people’s engagement with their accounts and assess whether its actions are working. HMRC’s understanding of Child Trust Fund accounts that have matured but are yet to be claimed is nearly two years out-of-date: its most recent estimate is based on data collected in April 2021, just seven months after the first accounts matured. It intends to publish its next set of statistics in summer 2023 based on data from April 2022. It told us it cut back its monitoring and compliance activity on the scheme from 2013, when the risk of tax loss from people opening Child Trust Funds they were not entitled to had fallen significantly. Consequently, since then HMRC has not been actively protecting Child Trust Fund customers (although the standard protections provided by the FCA still apply) or monitoring providers’ behaviour. HMRC has also not kept its records on Child Trust Funds up to date, affecting the effectiveness of its tracing tool. Recommendation 5: HMRC should: a) improve the timeliness of its data collection and statistical releases, to present a more accurate and up-to-date assessment of the scheme. b) use this improved understanding of the status of Child Trust Funds to target activity to improve young people’s awareness and management of their accounts.
6HMRC is not planning to re-evaluate the scheme or learn lessons from its implementation that...
Concluded (the committee's words)
HMRC is not planning to re-evaluate the scheme or learn lessons from its implementation that could help in the design or improvement of similar schemes. HMRC published an interim evaluation of the scheme in 2011 but has not reassessed the scheme since young adults first started claiming their money from matured accounts, which was in 2020. It claims there is no “particular appetite” for further evaluation. It told us that only ministers can decide if an evaluation of the scheme should be undertaken, with which we disagree. HMRC told us that its involvement in initiating evaluations is centred on advising ministers on the tax system, including areas it believes require further analysis. HMRC told us that from a policy perspective it learns lessons from previous work and creates ‘playbooks’ for 8 Child Trust Funds future policies. However, it is unclear to us how HMRC officials can give ministers comprehensive and up-to-date advice without sufficient evaluation of its schemes. It told us that government has learnt lessons from the experience of introducing Child Trust Funds, including on how to approach groups with very different levels of engagement with a universal scheme, but it has provided no detail of how those lessons have been learnt or where that learning has been captured. The engagement of the Share Foundation to manage Child Trust Funds on behalf of children in care has given a focus to those accounts and should be a lesson for HMRC on how to make its schemes work well for hard-to-reach groups. Recommendation 6: HMRC should, at the appropriate time within the next 24 months, evaluate the scheme to understand what has been achieved from government’s £2 billion investment and what impact it has had on the lives of young people and identify lessons that would benefit similar schemes in the future, particularly around how to design and implement a scheme that works well for vulnerable groups. Child Trust Funds 9 1 Access to Child Trust Funds
1On the basis of a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, we took evidence...
Concluded (the committee's words)
On the basis of a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, we took evidence from HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) and The Share Foundation regarding the Child Trust Fund scheme.1
7HMRC told us that some young people may have consciously chosen not to claim their...
Concluded (the committee's words)
HMRC told us that some young people may have consciously chosen not to claim their savings yet, but The Share Foundation told us that accounts typically go unclaimed because the young person does not know that the money is there and the account provider does not have their current address.9 Providers are experiencing difficulties contacting many account holders.10 HMRC has increased its communications since 2018. In 2020, it ran a social media communications campaign that led to peaks in enquiries. It also issued press notices in September 2021, prompting a feature on the Martin Lewis Show, and in October 2022, prompting 82 press articles and an eight-fold increase in queries to its ‘Find My CTF’ service. However, HMRC acknowledges Child Trust Fund account holders are not its usual audience, and that there are lessons to be learnt on how government communicates with disengaged groups.11 Providers’ charges and stewardship of the accounts
8Providers can charge fees up to a cap of 1.5% per year on ‘stakeholder’ accounts,...
Concluded (the committee's words)
Providers can charge fees up to a cap of 1.5% per year on ‘stakeholder’ accounts, the most common type of Child Trust Fund account, which The Share Foundation described as equating to nearly £30 per year on a typical account. HMRC does not track how much providers are charging. The NAO found that the largest providers are likely to be charging the maximum rate and estimated that providers could be earning collectively up to £100 million per year through charges on Child Trust Funds. The Share Foundation described the charges as “very high indeed for fund management”, but HMRC claimed the charges are less than the annual growth of these investments.12
9Providers are making even more money from some Child Trust Funds in other ways, as...
Concluded (the committee's words)
Providers are making even more money from some Child Trust Funds in other ways, as other types of Child Trust Fund have no cap on fees. Around 1.3 million Child Trust Funds (0.3 million stocks and shares accounts and 1.0 million cash deposit accounts) are not subject to the cap on fees. The Share Foundation described a case in which a provider had asked the charity to pay £20 for a single account statement, which it declined to do.13 7 Qq 24, 37, 56 8 Q 26, C&AG’s Report, para 2.4 9 Qq 25, 26 and 34 10 Qq 40–42 11 Qq 28, 46–47, 55; Correspondence from HMRC to PAC dated 7 June 2023 12 Qq 33, 35, 37; C&AG’s Report, para 3.8 13 Qq 35–36; C&AG’s Report, Figure 2 Child Trust Funds 11
10In many cases, the providers are likely to be making profits off savings mostly composed...
Concluded (the committee's words)
In many cases, the providers are likely to be making profits off savings mostly composed of government money. From the start of the scheme until 2010, just over one- third of Child Trust Funds (37%) received additional payments into them other than from the government. More recently, in the 2020–21 tax year, 4.6 million Child Trust Fund accounts out of the 5.5 million accounts on which HMRC had data received no additional money. One of our witnesses, who had previous experience working at a Child Trust Fund provider, told us that providers are likely to be incurring very few costs from managing a typical Child Trust Fund.14 Since April 2011, providers do not have to produce annual statements for accounts which have not received any payments (except for any from government) in the previous 12 months. However, providers are still required to provide statements in the year following the children’s 10th, 15th and 17th birthdays.15
11We heard that only four providers, out of around 55 in total, have been proactive...
Concluded (the committee's words)
We heard that only four providers, out of around 55 in total, have been proactive and voluntarily worked in partnership with the Tracing Group—a commercial service for tracing the owners of dormant accounts—to set up a Child Trust Fund register separate to the one held by HMRC. The register contains details of around 60% of all Child Trust Funds and is proving to be an effective way for young people to trace their accounts. However, the Share Foundation told us that most account providers are not showing much enthusiasm for helping young people to trace their accounts.16 Access for young people lacking the mental capacity to manage their savings
12To access the Child Trust Fund of a young person who lacks mental capacity, their...
Concluded (the committee's words)
To access the Child Trust Fund of a young person who lacks mental capacity, their family or carer must gain legal authority to do so by applying to the Court of Protection for a deputyship order if living in England and Wales. The Ministry of Justice estimates that between 63,000 and 126,000 young people may not have the mental capacity to access and manage their matured Child Trust Fund when they reach 18. However, the Court of Protection approved only 15 such applications during 2021. HMRC told us it understands that financial deputyship rules in Scotland and Northern Ireland are comparable to the rules in England and Wales. Similar issues are therefore likely to have arisen across the United Kingdom.17
13Child Trust Fund deputyship application process remains difficult, costly, and presents accessibility barriers.
Concluded (the committee's words)
Families have reported finding the deputyship application process difficult, time- consuming, and costly.18 Fees are waived if families are only applying to access a Child Trust Fund but there are other barriers – we heard examples of a six-page GP letter being needed as part of the process. The Down’s Syndrome Association told us that low awareness about banking safeguards among parents it supports is a barrier to accessing their children’s Child Trust Funds. It explained the fee waiver does not apply if the young adult is still in education, and that many families believe they also need to pay for services of a solicitor.19
14Ministry of Justice rejected proposals for easier access to small Child Trust Funds, despite recognized difficulties.
Concluded (the committee's words)
Providers, the Ministry of Justice and HMRC are aware of the issue. Some providers have, at their own risk, allowed families of young people without the capacity to manage 14 Qq 26, 35; C&AG’s Report, para 8; HM Revenue & Customs, Annual savings statistics 2022, June 2022. See Child Trust Fund Tables, table 2: Subscriptions to CTFs. 15 C&AG’s Report, para 1.8 16 Qq 33, 38–39, 43; C&AG’s Report, paras 3.6, 4.10 17 Qq 50, 61, 79–80; C&AG’s Report, para 4.13 18 C&AG’s Report, para 4.13 19 Q 48–49, 51; CTF0001; C&AG’s Report, para 4.13 12 Child Trust Funds the fund themselves to access funds in a Child Trust Fund up to £5,000. The Ministry of Justice recently consulted on a scheme to allow easier access to small funds. Many respondents suggested allowing applicants to demonstrate their suitability to access a young person’s small funds, such as a typical Child Trust Fund, by proving that they have already been given authority by government to manage the same young person’s benefits or other accounts. The Ministry of Justice decided not to proceed with the proposals.20 HMRC emphasised to us that the owners of matured Child Trust Funds are adults, and the law needs to protect their interests, finding a balance between safeguarding vulnerable young adults and helping the people who have their best interests at heart to manage their assets. It told us that its guidance explains what people need to do.21 20 Qq 48, 51–52; Ministry of Justice, Mental Capacity Act: Small Payments Scheme: Consultation response; May 2023 21 Q 52 Child Trust Funds 13 2 Learning from the Child Trust Fund scheme Achieving the scheme’s policy objectives
15HMRC inaccurately considers Child Trust Fund scheme ended despite its ongoing active status.
Concluded (the committee's words)
HMRC regards the Child Trust Fund policy as having “ended in 2011”, and as an “old scheme” as opposed to an existing scheme.22 This is despite the scheme being very much live, as most young people who benefitted from the scheme have not yet reached the age at which they can access their Child Trust Fund.23
16HMRC demonstrates insufficient curiosity regarding Child Trust Fund scheme's impact on financial literacy.
Concluded (the committee's words)
HMRC saw its role as setting up of the accounts and transferring government funding into them, which it believes it did effectively.24 The Child Trust Fund scheme’s policy objectives also include helping people understand the benefits of saving and investing; encouraging parents and children to develop the habit of saving and engage with financial institutions; and building on financial education.25 HMRC’s told us it has not particularly had a role in financial education, although it has included information about Child Trust Funds in the materials it provides to its ‘tax ambassadors’, who visit schools to teach young people about tax.26 HMRC has no plans to examine whether the Child Trust Fund scheme has had an impact on financial literacy, and nor does any other part of government. The Share Foundation told us that it believes only about 25% of students leave school saying that they have been adequately prepared in financial awareness. We expressed concern about HMRC’s lack of curiosity about whether the policies it is implementing are working.27
17HMRC lacks dedicated funding and effective partnerships to achieve Child Trust Fund objectives.
Concluded (the committee's words)
HMRC made clear its view that the duty to implement the policy was not fully its responsibility. HM Treasury has not given HMRC dedicated funding for the scheme. The Share Foundation believes that HM Treasury is not allowing HMRC to do more with Child Trust Funds, despite some in HMRC wanting to do so. However, HMRC has not established effective partnerships with other departments and organisations involved in Child Trust Funds, a step which it acknowledges is needed to implement and achieve the policy’s objectives.28
18Child Trust Funds risk becoming a neglected legacy product with high fees.
Concluded (the committee's words)
We are concerned that Child Trust Funds will become another example of a legacy financial product that is not given the necessary attention by government to succeed against its aims over the long-term. We have noticed in other projects that legacy products often have very high fees because they are under no real scrutiny.29 Monitoring the scheme
19HMRC's data on unclaimed Child Trust Fund accounts remains significantly out-of-date.
Concluded (the committee's words)
HMRC’s understanding of accounts yet to be claimed is nearly two years out-of-date: its most recent estimate of the number of Child Trust Fund accounts yet to be claimed 22 Qq 27, 86; Hansard, HC written answer, Child Trust Fund, UIN 181783, answered 24 April 2023 23 Q 1; C&AG’s Report, para 4.2 24 Qq 69, 94 25 Q 72 ; C&AG’s Report, para 4.15 26 Qq 72–75 27 Qq 66, 89, 92–93 28 Qq 44, 81–82, 94 29 Qq 34, 87 14 Child Trust Funds is based on data collected in April 2021, seven months after the first accounts matured. It told us that it intends to publish its next set of statistics in summer 2023 based on data from April 2022.30
20HMRC significantly reduced Child Trust Fund monitoring and compliance activity since 2013.
Concluded (the committee's words)
HMRC receives annual returns from providers with information about Child Trust Funds, including the number of accounts held and the number that have not been accessed by their owners. It told us that in the period when new accounts were being opened it received fortnightly returns from providers, but it cut back its monitoring and compliance activity on the scheme in 2013.31
21HMRC has not actively protected Child Trust Fund customers or monitored provider behaviour.
Concluded (the committee's words)
HMRC judged that, by 2013, the risk of tax loss from people opening Child Trust Funds they were not entitled to had fallen significantly. Few Child Trust Funds were opened after this point. We questioned whether HMRC had also assessed the risk of Child Trust Funds being mismanaged, such that young people might be losing money. HMRC told us that it has not been actively protecting Child Trust Fund customers or monitoring providers’ behaviour, although the standard protections provided by the Financial Conduct Authority still apply.32
22HMRC's outdated Child Trust Fund records hinder tracing tool, making account retrieval challenging.
Concluded (the committee's words)
HMRC has not kept its records on Child Trust Funds up to date, affecting the quality of its tracing tool. This means young people trying to trace their accounts through the Government Gateway are receiving data from HMRC that have not been updated since their account was originally opened, typically around 18 years ago. It is likely that the provider for many of these accounts will have changed, as the NAO found the number of Child Trust Fund providers has reduced from 74 in April 2011 to 55 in February 2023, due to providers merging or exiting from the market. HMRC acknowledged that some people need further assistance to interpret the responses they get from HMRC about their Child Trust Funds.33 It has no way of knowing how many queries to the service resulted in someone successfully finding their Child Trust Fund. Young people using the Government Gateway need to verify their identity, which The Share Foundation told us many find challenging.34 Evaluation and learning from the scheme
23HMRC has not evaluated Child Trust Fund scheme since 2011, despite international interest
Concluded (the committee's words)
HMRC has not published an evaluation of the scheme since 2011. It has not reassessed the scheme now that young adults are claiming their accounts, stating that there is no “particular appetite” for this.35 The Share Foundation described “quite a bit of international interest” in the outcomes of the Child Trust Fund scheme, and told us Bristol University has approached it about conducting survey research into young people who have found their Child Trust Funds through the independent Child Trust Fund register.36
24HMRC lacks detail on how policy lessons are learned or captured for future schemes
Concluded (the committee's words)
HMRC told us that from a policy perspective it learns lessons from previous work and creates ‘playbooks’ for future policies. While we are glad to hear that HMRC does this, we expressed concern that it is in a position to offer advice to ministers only on how to implement a scheme similar to Child Trust Funds, rather than on whether the 30 Q 24; C&AG’s Report, para 3.3 31 Q 30; C&AG’s Report, para 4.2 32 Qq 30–33; C&AG’s Report, para 3.5 33 Qq 44, 85; C&AG’s Report, para 10 34 Qq 44, 93; C&AG’s Report, para 4.8 35 Qq 64–65, 86 36 Q 65 Child Trust Funds 15 evidence suggests such a scheme would be an effective use of taxpayers’ money.37 HMRC told us that government has learnt lessons about implementing a universal scheme from the experience of Child Trust Funds, including about the importance of partnerships, and about how to approach groups with very different levels of engagement. However, it provided no detail of how those lessons have been learnt or where that learning has been captured.38
25Share Foundation provides essential financial training to care leavers for Child Trust Funds
Concluded (the committee's words)
The engagement of the Share Foundation to manage Child Trust Funds on behalf of children in care has given a focus to those accounts. The Share Foundation told us about the disciplined handover process it has introduced to ensure that when young people whose accounts it manages approach the age of 18, they are made aware of their account and are offered financial awareness training to help them to manage their savings effectively.39
26HMRC lacks independent evaluation trigger and transparency for evaluation spending
Concluded (the committee's words)
When we questioned HMRC on what would trigger it to evaluate the scheme, it told us that it would need ministers to request it. We queried the extent to which looking at the impact of a scheme is a political policy decision, as opposed to a decision for officials, and expressed concern at how little evaluation is done across government. HMRC noted that its involvement in initiating evaluations is centred on its role advising ministers on the tax system, including areas it believes require further analysis.40 It cannot identify how much it typically spends on evaluation as it does not track these costs separately from general policy and programme delivery costs. It spent £5.9 million on external research in 2022–23, of which it estimates around one-third was on evaluation. In comparison, its operational (DEL) spending limit for the same year was £7.1 billion.41 37 Qq 87–88 38 Qq 55, 82, 94 39 Qq 56–57 40 Qq 86–88 41 Correspondence from HMRC to PAC dated 7 June 2023; HM Treasury, Central Government Supply Estimates 2022–23: Main Supply Estimates, HC 396, June 2022, page 356 16 Child Trust Funds
Evidence
Oral evidence sessions 1
- 18 May 2023Child Trust Funds4 witnesses, listed belowparliament.uk ↗
Who gave evidence 4 witnesses
- Anthony WalkerDirector of Operations, The Share Foundation
- Emily AntcliffeDirector of Individuals Policy, HMRC
- Gavin OldhamChairman and founder, The Share Foundation
- Jim Harra CBFirst Permanent Secretary and Chief Executive, HM Revenue and Customs