Source · Select Committees · Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Recommendation 14
14
Paragraph: 69
The wide definition of “public order” contained with the Bill risks catching levels of behaviour...
Conclusion
The wide definition of “public order” contained with the Bill risks catching levels of behaviour that fall below what we consider to be the appropriate threshold to deprive a person of protection as a victim of slavery or human trafficking. For example, clause 62(3) catches historic offending, minor offending, offending where a person was compelled to do so by their captors in a slavery or human trafficking situation, cases where there has been no conviction, and cases relying on unsafe convictions from overseas. Moreover, it is important to recall that Article 13 ECAT only permits these exceptions where “grounds of public order prevent it”—therefore, even for those individuals who may fall within one of the limbs in clause 62(3), a person should not be excluded unless it is additionally shown that they, as an individual, present such an ongoing risk to public order as to enable the UK to avail itself of the exception in Article 13 ECAT.
Paragraph Reference:
69
Government Response
A response document is linked to this report, dated 25 February 2022. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document ↗