Source · Select Committees · Human Rights (Joint Committee)

Recommendation 20

20 Paragraph: 142

Despite the presumption that a person who has committed such a crime amounts to a...

Conclusion
Despite the presumption that a person who has committed such a crime amounts to a ‘danger to the community’ remaining rebuttable, the proposal to lower the threshold for what constitutes a ‘particularly serious crime’ to any offence receiving a 12-month sentence would not be consistent with the language of Article 33(2) or with the humanitarian purpose of the Refugee Convention. The combination of the new threshold with provisions expressly denying an individual the opportunity to prove that he has not committed a ‘particularly serious’ offence would ‘expand the scope’ of Article 33(2) and ‘correspondingly weaken the principle of non- refoulement itself’. The Bill requires amendment to remove the lowering of this threshold.
Paragraph Reference: 142
Government Response

A response document is linked to this report, dated 18 March 2022. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document ↗