Source · Select Committees · Human Rights (Joint Committee)

Recommendation 46

46

The proposal that a Bill of Rights should provide for damages to be reduced or...

Conclusion
The proposal that a Bill of Rights should provide for damages to be reduced or removed on account of the claimant’s conduct, specifically confined to the circumstances of the claim, is unnecessary, and risks unbalancing the equitable approach to damages currently taken by the courts. To extend that proposal to wider conduct outside the circumstances of the case would constitute an indirect but dangerous attack on the fundamental universality of human rights and should be rejected. (Paragraph 200) Strengthening rights
Government Response

A response document is linked to this report, dated 14 July 2022. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document ↗