Source · Select Committees · Human Rights (Joint Committee)

Recommendation 17

17 Paragraph: 79

Inquests are often used as a means of discharging the State’s obligation under Article 2...

Conclusion
Inquests are often used as a means of discharging the State’s obligation under Article 2 ECHR. The cessation of inquests means that the ICRIR must be capable of delivering Article 2 compliant investigations in lieu of the inquest system. As set out above, the ability of the ICRIR to satisfy this is not guaranteed. We are concerned that the cessation of inquests will deny the families of victims their legitimate expectation to an Article 2 compliant investigation into the deaths of their next- of-kin. We therefore propose that inquests be permitted to continue in accordance with the current five-year plan (see Annex, Amendment 17).
Paragraph Reference: 79
Government Response

A response document is linked to this report, dated 2 March 2023. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document ↗