Green Deal: watching brief (part 2)
Closed
What the inquiry looked at
“In May 2013, the Committee published the Green Deal: watching brief report in which we outlined our concerns about the lack of clarity regarding the outcomes that DECC expected from the Green Deal and how it would measure the success of this flagship policy. We identified key areas in which scrutiny would be beneficial, and outlined our intention to review the performance of the Green Deal and Energy Company Obligation (ECO) at a later date. A list of information and statistics that we would find useful in doing this is set out in recommendation 16 of the report.”
The committee's words, from the inquiry page on parliament.uk ↗.
What it found
Insulating our homes to make them warmer will bring benefits both for homeowners, in the form of lower bills, and for society, as the UK enhances its energy security and lowers its carbon emissions. Yet the Government’s flagship Green Deal finance scheme, designed to deliver these benefits, has been a disappointing failure in its first eighteen months.
Rather than facilitating access to energy efficiency measures and creating momentum in the market, the Green Deal has caused frustration and confusion for both consumers and businesses in the supply chain. Only 4,000 Green Deal plans have so far been initiated. As a result, carbon savings through Green Deal finance have been negligible.
A combination of financial, communication and behavioural barriers has meant that the policy has been slow to attract customers. The costs associated with the Green Deal process have been repeatedly cited as the prime reasons for the poor take up of the scheme.
Households who pass standard credit checks can simply often obtain cheaper loans elsewhere. But the benefits of the Green Deal’s market-based approach and of the pay-as-you-save model have also been undermined by the fact that the scheme has lacked flexibility and clarity at every stage. Frequent changes to both the Green Deal and the Energy Company Obligation (ECO) have created uncertainty and insecurity and have alienated many customers. Failure to plan an appropriate communication strategy has meant that DECC has been unable to drum up support even amongst those households that could benefit most from a Green Deal loan.
To the extent that the Green Deal finance alleviates the need for large upfront energy-efficiency installation costs, it is, in principle, an attractive proposition. But loans of this sort will only appeal to a fraction of households. Alternative financial incentives, and other measures and regulations, should now be considered in tandem with the Green Deal to encourage energy efficiency across wider sections of society. Stamp duty discounts or variable council tax rates could encourage more homeowners and households to improve the energy efficiency ratings of their properties and we urge DECC and the Treasury to consider such ideas.
Given concerns over rising energy bills, fuel poverty, energy security and climate change, renewed efforts to promote the Green Deal and energy efficiency must be a priority for the Government. Our homes and buildings are responsible for over a third of the UK’s greenhouse gas emissions and wasting heat is simply a waste of money. Nonetheless, calling time on cold homes and retrofitting the UK’s existing housing stock is an ambitious aim and it cannot be met without substantial efforts to promote energy efficiency across all regions and sections of the population. While we continue to support the principle of the Green Deal, the Government must re-evaluate its approach and set out a clear strategy to revive the failing scheme. Unless the package is made more attractive to a wider group of consumers, Green Deal finance is likely to remain unappealing to many.
What the government said
The government responded on 12 December 2014.
The government does not accept the Committee's main conclusion that the Green Deal has been a failure, while stating that there is "still a great deal to do" and responding to each main recommendation.
- It does "not agree" that it would be appropriate to set a public target for the number of Green Deal Finance plans, since finance is "simply a means to an end"; its public target is to improve 1,000,000 homes by March 2015.
- It agrees that the first iteration of the Green Deal was too complex, and says changes are under way, listing nineteen in Annex A.
- On the Golden Rule, it says it was designed on a conservative basis, but will "continue to work with industry and consumer groups" to consider refinements; a review of in-use factors is expected in Spring 2015.
- It states it is "seeking to establish" a Department for Work and Pensions service to confirm benefit eligibility for Affordable Warmth, and "expect to have the service in place by Summer 2015".
Read the government's response ↗ Read the report ↗ Report an error
How the inquiry ran
Each dot is a dated item listed on this page, from the inquiry's opening on 17 December 2013 to 12 December 2014.
- Oral evidence 4 sessions
- Report 15 Sep 2014
- Government response 12 Dec 2014
What it recommended 6 recommendations · 13 conclusions
1With such extremely low levels of take-up eighteen months into the life of the policy,...
2The Green Deal process is too complicated and has led to confusion and mistrust.
3The Government needs to deal with the criticisms surrounding the poor take-up of the Green...
4We recommend that DECC set out a robust framework through which the Green Deal can...
5The Green Deal and ECO have similar goals but are different programmes operating in distinct...
6We recommend that DECC clarifies what it expects the Green Deal to be used for...
7We welcome the Government’s commitment to introduce a financing mechanism available to those who would...
8We recognise the need for consumer protection in calculating the Golden rule, but DECC should...
9The Government should set out in its response the extent to which (a) improvements in...
10It is disappointing that customers wishing to take out a Green Deal plan are either...
11We recommend that the Government should be more proactive in identifying the households most in...
12We welcome DECC’s initiatives to encourage energy efficiency in the domestic private rental sector.
13The Green Deal is suffering from a lack of engagement between consumers and the market.
14A new communication strategy is needed, which promotes energy efficiency for (a) individuals; (b) communities;...
15As part of DECC’s new approach to communication, it should determine the best strategies to...
16In addition to a national communications campaign, the involvement of local authorities and associations is...
17The Green Deal has failed to live up to expectations: its planning was flawed, its...
18The Green Deal could play a crucial role in meeting the UK’s emission reduction targets,...
19Retrofitting the UK’s existing housing stock is an ambitious and worthwhile aim.
Evidence
Oral evidence sessions 4
- 17 Jun 2014No witnesses recordedparliament.uk ↗
- 7 May 2014No witnesses recordedparliament.uk ↗
- 29 Apr 2014No witnesses recordedparliament.uk ↗
- 1 Apr 2014No witnesses recordedparliament.uk ↗