Green Deal watching brief
Closed
What the inquiry looked at
“The Green Deal is the Government’s flagship initiative to help householders and businesses increase energy efficiency in the home. The aim of Green Deal is to help households and businesses to improve their energy efficiency, thereby reducing their energy consumption and helping them to save money. In turn, the energy savings that are expected to be gained as a result of the initiative will help the UK meet its carbon reduction targets and energy security objectives. Key to the success of the Green Deal is consumer willingness to take up Green Deal offers, but the Committee has heard from witnesses to its Consumer Engagement with Energy Markets inquiry that there is some concern that take-up might be low. Concerns have also been expressed about the extent to which consumers will benefit financially from the Green Deal if loan rates are too high. Consumers are now able to get Green Deal assessments and will be able to sign up to finance plans from the end of January 2013. If take-up is low, energy efficiency and carbon savings will not be achieved, but what level of take-up would constitute success? It is crucial to track the progress of the Green Deal in delivering its core aims and to learn lessons to make improvements in future if necessary. For these reasons, the Energy and Climate Change Committee has undertaken to keep a watching brief on the Green Deal.”
The committee's words, from the inquiry page on parliament.uk ↗.
What it found
Energy efficiency can help to deliver energy security, climate change and affordability ambitions. The Government launched its flagship energy efficiency policies – the Green Deal and Energy Companies Obligation (ECO) – earlier this year and both will play an essential role in helping the UK to use energy more wisely. As a Committee, we believe that energy efficiency should be a priority for the Department and so we hope that the schemes will be a success. We intend to monitor the Green Deal and ECO over time. Our ongoing scrutiny will help to evaluate whether delivery is proceeding according to plan and, should any unexpected problems be encountered, to assist in developing remedies to get the programme back on track.
In order to provide effective scrutiny, we need to understand what the Government is hoping to achieve through the Green Deal and ECO, but there is some confusion about exactly what outcomes DECC is expecting to see. We were disappointed that the Minister was not able to give us a clear idea of what success would look like. We believe this is problematic because without this information, it will be impossible to tell whether delivery is happening according to plan, exceeding expectations or whether improvements are required. We hope that DECC will be able to provide greater clarity on this point.
We would also welcome more information about the Government’s proposed methodology for its own monitoring and evaluation of the Green Deal and ECO. It is important to determine this soon, so that opportunities to record baseline data are not missed. There may also be scope for greater collaboration with other organisations, such as academic institutions and the energy companies themselves, which could help DECC’s evaluation budget go further.
We have identified seven key areas where we believe scrutiny will be beneficial:
• public awareness and communications;
• take-up levels;
• energy and carbon savings;
• financial savings and value for money;
• access to the Green Deal and ECO;
• customer satisfaction; and • supply chain and job creation.
We intend to use these topics as the basis for our future inquiries into the Green Deal. We have identified a number of key indicators under each heading that will be useful in our ongoing scrutiny. These are set out in full in chapter 3 of this report.
We very much hope that the Green Deal and ECO will be successful and that we can play a part in maximising their efficacy through our scrutiny of both programmes.
What the government said
The government responded on 26 July 2013.
The government accepts most of the Committee's monitoring recommendations on the Green Deal, in whole or in part, but does not accept some requests for data it says it does not hold or considers misleading.
- It agrees that fixed targets are inappropriate for a market-based approach, but states an expectation of "one or more energy efficiency improvement measures fitted in 1 million households" by March 2015.
- On actual carbon savings, it agrees monitoring would be useful and will use the National Energy Efficiency Database, aiming to publish this information for 2013 installations in 2016.
- It does not intend to accept publishing average Green Deal interest rates, saying doing so "could mislead and confuse consumers".
- It does not accept the recommendation on households contacting the Energy Saving Advice Service without proceeding to an assessment, saying robust information would be "disproportionately difficult and costly to obtain".
Read the government's response ↗ Read the report ↗ Report an error
How the inquiry ran
Each dot is a dated item listed on this page, from the inquiry's opening on 6 December 2012 to 26 July 2013.
- Oral evidence 2 sessions
- Report 22 May 2013
- Government response 26 Jul 2013
What it recommended 1 recommendation · 0 conclusions
50We recommend that the collaborative research approach outlined in paragraph 24 be used to monitor...
Evidence
Oral evidence sessions 2
- 5 Mar 2013No witnesses recordedparliament.uk ↗
- 6 Feb 2013No witnesses recordedparliament.uk ↗