Select committee: Economic Affairs Committee

Devolution of public finances in the UK inquiry

Closed Opened 26 Jun 2015 Closed 9 Dec 2015
Inquiry scope (the committee's words)
In the report, the Committee regret that MPs did not have the opportunity to scrutinise the fiscal framework before the Scotland Bill passed through the House of Commons and say that it should not move to Committee stage in the House of Lords, the first stage where amendments can be made to the Bill, until the framework is agreed by the UK and Scottish Government and published.

Where it stands

The inquiry is closed, opened 26 June 2015.

The committee has published 1 report, most recently 1st Report - A Fracturing Union? The Implications of Financial Devolution to Scotland on 20 November 2015.

The government's response

Published 20 January 2016.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government "warmly welcomes" the Lords Economic Affairs Committee report and says it is "committed to delivering the All-Party Smith Agreement in full", while disagreeing with the Committee on some points.

  • On the fiscal framework, the government "agrees with the recommendation that the Bill and the fiscal framework are best considered together". It says it cannot unilaterally give an end date for the negotiations because "it involves two parties", and it commits to depositing updates after each Joint Exchequer Committee meeting.
  • On the Barnett Formula, the government "notes the Committee's findings" and says there is "a clear commitment across Parliament to retain the Barnett Formula", which will continue to determine changes in the block grant.
  • On income tax devolution, the government "disagrees that it has been selected without full consideration of the consequences" and "does not agree that the link between the Scottish electorate and the UK government will be weakened".
  • On scrutiny, the government "fully agrees with the principle" of scrutiny, but has "some concerns" about giving the OBR a formal role and says "no decisions have been taken". On Barnett transparency, it "will consider the Committee's recommendation ahead of Report stage of the Bill".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error

Reports

1 report

Oral evidence sessions

6 sessions

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

Date Session and witnesses Source
27 Oct 2015
Oral evidence session
No witnesses recorded
View ↗
20 Oct 2015
Oral evidence session
No witnesses recorded
View ↗
13 Oct 2015
Oral evidence session
No witnesses recorded
View ↗
15 Sep 2015
Oral evidence session
No witnesses recorded
View ↗
9 Sep 2015
Oral evidence session
No witnesses recorded
View ↗
21 Jul 2015
Oral evidence session
No witnesses recorded
View ↗

Correspondence

4 letters

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.