Select committee: Science and Technology Committee

Conclusion 36

2nd Report - Nature-based solutions: rhetoric or reality? - The potential contribution of nature-based solutions to net zero in the UK Published 27 Jan 2022 Paragraph 144
Conclusion (the committee's words)
There is a lack of agreed standards for projects and ecosystems other than large-scale tree-planting and peatland restoration. Some beneficial land use practices, such as improved management of working forests or agricultural peatlands, that sequester carbon or prevent it from being emitted are excluded from the Woodland Carbon Code and the Peatland Code.

From: Science and Technology Committee, 2nd Report - Nature-based solutions: rhetoric or reality? - The potential contribution of nature-based solutions to net zero in the UK, paragraph 144, 27 January 2022

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 21 April 2022 (deadline 27 March 2022).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government welcomes the Committee's report and sets out action on its recommendations, accepting some points (including blue carbon research and a precautionary approach) while saying the need for a land use strategy "will be kept under review".

  • On marine research, it says "We accept the importance of the recommended areas of research" and "We accept there is more evidence to be gathered", pointing to the planned UK Blue Carbon Evidence Partnership.
  • On a precautionary approach where evidence is lacking, it "accept[s] and agree[s]" it is appropriate, but would not "automatically see gaps in data as a barrier".
  • On a land use strategy, it does not commit to one, saying the approach and "the need for a land use strategy" will be kept under review as spatial analysis progresses this year.
  • On private finance, it agrees buyers and sellers should be able to aggregate projects and combine revenue streams, subject to scheme rules, and plans to develop a standards framework "later this year".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error