Select committee: Science and Technology Committee

Conclusion 51

1st Report - “Science and technology superpower”: more than a slogan? Published 4 Aug 2022 Paragraph 119
Conclusion (the committee's words)
Reforms to tax credits, intellectual property regulations and public procurement could be driven by government taskforces in each area, providing a single point of feedback for stakeholders to propose reforms. These should be headed by individuals given accountability for the delivery of each element of reform across government.

From: Science and Technology Committee, 1st Report - “Science and technology superpower”: more than a slogan?, paragraph 119, 4 August 2022

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 6 March 2023 (deadline 3 March 2023).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government agrees that science and technology are essential to the UK's future and points to the new Department for Science, Innovation and Technology as its main response, while accepting some recommendations and not others.

  • On strategy and metrics, it agrees that "policy coherence is essential" and says it is "considering how best to monitor progress", "with the aim of capturing measurable indicators across key priority areas".
  • On the Own-Collaborate-Access framework, it says it is analysing which technologies should be priorities and "will set these out in the near future".
  • On the National Science and Technology Council, it "has noted" the Committee's recommendations on publishing details of committee discussions, and states that it is "a long-established precedent" that such information "is not normally shared publicly".
  • On departmental research funding, it states that it "does not accept that there is a risk" of duplicating UKRI funding, and says departments need not update their areas of research interest annually.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error