Government response to Safety Of Rwanda (Asylum And Immigration) Bill report

This is the government's response, published 14 March 2024.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government does not accept the Committee's constitutional concerns, stating it is "satisfied" that the Bill is compliant with the UK's international obligations, including the ECHR.

• On the courts and the separation of powers, it says "We do not accept that this Bill is being used to reverse factual conclusions made by the Supreme Court"; it says the treaty and evidence of change in Rwanda will "enable Parliament to conclude that Rwanda is safe".
• On access to justice, it says clause 4 protects access to courts on "compelling evidence" about individual circumstances, but accepts that the Bill "will however preclude almost all grounds for individual challenge" and that individuals can still go to Strasbourg.
• On guidance to decision-makers, it says guidance "will be provided" but that it "would not be appropriate or proportionate for Home Office guidance to be put before Parliament".
• On the section 19(1)(b) statement, it says this "does not mean that the Bill is incompatible" with the Convention, and that the Government "is satisfied that the Bill is compatible with the Convention rights".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error