Select committee: Constitution Committee

Conclusion 1

12th Report - A Question of Confidence? The Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011 Published 4 Sep 2020 Paragraph 21
Conclusion (the committee's words)
The Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011 changed core aspects of the UK constitution. It has proved controversial. Given the Government’s commitment to repeal the Act, for which it has support in principle from the Official Opposition, a review of it is timely.

From: Constitution Committee, 12th Report - A Question of Confidence? The Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011, paragraph 21, 4 September 2020

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 1 December 2020 (deadline 4 November 2020).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The Government says its draft Bill will repeal the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011 and revive the pre-2011 prerogative powers over dissolution, so that no Commons vote is required.

  • It agrees that these powers should not be "abrogated to the Courts", and the draft Bill contains an ouster clause making their exercise and limits non-justiciable.
  • It agrees that certainty on term length is desirable: the draft Bill provides that, if an election is not called earlier, Parliament will automatically dissolve five years after it first met.
  • It considers the two-thirds majority requirement under the FTPA "undesirable", and says confidence motions operate most effectively as a matter of convention rather than in statutory form.
  • It does not accept that the power to set the date of the election should be given to the Commons or be subject to Parliamentary approval.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error