Select committee: Constitution Committee

Recommendation 28

9th Report - The roles of the Lord Chancellor and the Law Officers Published 18 Jan 2023 Paragraph 238
Recommendation (the committee's words)
It is essential that those appointed to Law Officer roles continue to be legally qualified, with relevant experience. Of equal importance to formal qualifications is the character and independence of mind of the Law Officers, which cannot be easily defined in statute. We recommend Prime Ministers appoint only Law Officers with the independence of mind, autonomy and strength of character to deliver impartial legal advice to the Government, even where it is unwelcome.

From: Constitution Committee, 9th Report - The roles of the Lord Chancellor and the Law Officers, paragraph 238, 18 January 2023

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 17 March 2023 (deadline 18 March 2023).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The Government agrees with the Committee on the importance of the rule of law and the value of Law Officers being politicians, but it has "no current plans to review the existing arrangements" for the offices of Lord Chancellor and the Law Officers.

  • The Government agrees that "defending the judiciary against unfair, personal or threatening abuse is a core part of the Lord Chancellor’s role", but "respectfully disagrees" that a Lord Chancellor must intervene publicly, saying that an expectation of public intervention "might prove counterproductive".
  • On a constitutional lead, the Government believes there is "greater strength in having a number of senior Ministerial leads on discrete constitutional matters", rather than the Lord Chancellor holding overall responsibility, and says ministerial appointments are a matter for the Prime Minister.
  • On the Ministerial Code and Cabinet Manual, the Government is "always open to looking at whether updates or amendments are needed" and "remains committed to producing an updated edition of the Cabinet Manual before the end of the current Parliament". It notes a possible danger that codification "is reductive".
  • On the Lord Chancellor's oath, the Government "remains unpersuaded" that rewording it to refer to upholding the rule of law would affect the discharge of the duty. On the Internal Market Act and Northern Ireland Protocol Bill, the Law Officers "have nothing further to add at this time".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error