Select committee: Constitution Committee

Recommendation 5

12th Report - Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill Published 25 Jan 2023
Recommendation (the committee's words)
We reiterate our firm conclusion that the size and complexity of omnibus bills impede proper legislative scrutiny in Parliament and welcome the Leader of the House’s recent comments on the matter. Local democracy and greater decentralisation in England

From: Constitution Committee, 12th Report - Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill, 25 January 2023

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 13 July 2023.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government agrees that overly large bills can impede scrutiny but considers that this Bill "strikes an appropriate balance between scale and manageability", and it explains its position on devolution, delegated powers and other matters raised by the Committee.

  • On size, the government agrees that "overly large bills can impede proper scrutiny" but would be "wary of suggesting" there can usefully be an "upper limit", and does not feel it "entirely fair" to call the Bill a 'Christmas Tree' Bill.
  • On devolution in England, it "wholeheartedly" agrees there must be a careful balance between local variation and added complexity, and considers the Bill's framework provides "a common architecture for devolution deals".
  • On the Sewel Convention, it does "not consider the legislative consent process to be engaged" for Part 1. It has tabled amendments for Report stage on consulting devolved authorities (Part 1) and giving devolved administrations concurrent powers (Part 6).
  • On common frameworks, it "disagrees with the view of the Committee" that Part 6 could undermine consensus-seeking and joint working. On planning law, it has set out amendments limiting the power's use and capping relief at "a maximum of one year".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error