Select committee: Justice Committee

Conclusion 8

7th Report: Coronavirus (COVID-19): the impact on the legal professions in England and Wales Published 3 Aug 2020 Paragraph 27 Addressed to Ministry of Justice
Conclusion (the committee's words)
The furlough scheme has been very useful, with both solicitors’ firms and barristers’ chambers using it to reduce staff costs. We heard that the loan schemes were less helpful, particularly for small high street firms.

From: Justice Committee, 7th Report: Coronavirus (COVID-19): the impact on the legal professions in England and Wales (HC 520), paragraph 27, 3 August 2020

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 19 October 2020 (deadline 3 October 2020).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government welcomes the Committee's report and responds to its recommendations by setting out the support and measures already in place, with further work and evaluation planned.

  • On remote hearings, it says there "will be a further evaluation" of their use during the pandemic, with findings "planned to be available in early 2021".
  • On the Law Society's proposals for monthly payments, it says it has "carefully considered" them but that using the Standard Monthly Payment as contractual relief would give "an inconsistent application of support". It will "consider appropriate means of support as necessary".
  • On the Self-Employed Income Support Scheme, it states that requiring a 2018-19 tax return was "a difficult decision" taken "for practical reasons, to minimise the opportunity for fraudulent activity". Legal firms not eligible for business rates relief have "benefitted from the wider business and employment support package".
  • On law centres, it says "We agree with the Committee" that not-for-profit providers play a vital role, and points to £5.4m in emergency grant funding secured for them.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error