Select committee: Justice Committee

Conclusion 28

3rd Report - The Future of Legal Aid Published 27 Jul 2021 Paragraph 108 Addressed to Ministry of Justice
Conclusion (the committee's words)
We recognise that the Government is making progress in improving legal support and information for litigants in person, but we caution the Government that such measures should not be seen as an alternative to tailored legal advice. We are aware that in areas such as benefits, non-legally qualified specialist advisors can provide appropriate assistance However, as long as our system is characterised by complex legal frameworks and an adversarial justice system, the availability of individualised legal advice and support will remain necessary.

From: Justice Committee, 3rd Report - The Future of Legal Aid (HC 70), paragraph 108, 27 July 2021

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 16 November 2021 (deadline 27 September 2021).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government responds mainly by pointing to ongoing reviews and pilots, in particular the Criminal Legal Aid Independent Review, and does not set out firm decisions on most recommendations.

  • On criminal legal aid fees and sustainability, it says it "will address this issue" in its response to Sir Christopher Bellamy's review, and has "committed to responding to the Review's final report before the end of 2021".
  • On the means test, it says it intends to publish the Means Test Review "alongside a public consultation shortly", and will address the report's related points following that consultation.
  • On civil legal aid, it is "already considering" sustainability internally and is developing an early legal advice pilot in social welfare law, with further details to be announced "in due course".
  • On judicial directions for Exceptional Case Funding, it says the Legal Aid Agency takes decisions "completely free from outside influence" and it does "not believe that this position should change".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error