Select committee: Justice Committee
Conclusion 18
4th Report - Covid-19 and the criminal law
Published 24 Sep 2021
Paragraph 45
Addressed to Ministry of Justice
Justice Committee Covid-19 and the criminal law All items in this report Report on parliament.uk ↗ Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗
Conclusion (the committee's words)
We recognise that sometimes novel offences were created at speed and that there was inevitably, therefore, some initial uncertainty about their extent and application. The concept of legal certainty is also an essential component of the rule of law. In principle, all restrictions should be cast in terms of sufficient clarity and certainty to enable people to understand whether certain kinds of activity will or will not incur criminal liability. Government communication of any new criminal offences must always accurately reflect the true legal position so as not to undermine public trust, and subsequently public compliance. We recognise that the novelty of these offences meant the usual clarity in the law that evolves as cases are prosecuted and heard by the courts was necessarily absent and clarity and understanding of the public, police and the courts can naturally be expected to improve over time as happens with other offences.
From: Justice Committee, 4th Report - Covid-19 and the criminal law (HC 71), paragraph 45, 24 September 2021
Government response
The government responded to the whole report on 8 September 2022 (deadline 24 November 2021).
Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.The government accepts or agrees with some recommendations, including on Ministry of Justice consultation over new offences, disagrees with others, and says it will draw on the public inquiry and existing review work for lessons on future pandemics.
- On new criminal offences, the government accepts that guidance should be updated so departments consult the Ministry of Justice as a matter of course. The guidance will also set standard response timeframes and cover urgent situations, with publication "in due course".
- On explanatory memoranda for statutory instruments, it considers a specific heading for new offences "disproportionate". It will instead update existing drafting guidance so the "Policy background" section explains any new offences.
- On the single justice procedure, the Ministry of Justice states it "does not agree" with the recommendations on transparency and on a formal review of its use in COVID-19 cases, citing existing media access arrangements and safeguards.
- On fixed penalty notices, it recognises that the regime "presented challenges for enforcement and compliance". It will take this into consideration, with the public inquiry's findings, in planning for future pandemics.