Source · Select Committees · Justice Committee
Recommendation 17
17
Require primary legislation to enable a comprehensive IPP resentencing exercise
Recommendation
As Lord Thomas noted in R v Roberts: “It was Parliament which legislated to establish a regime of sentences of IPP in terms which the courts have faithfully and IPP sentences 61 properly applied. It must, in our democracy and in accordance with the rule of law, be for Parliament to provide a correction for the outcome if it so wishes”. We agree. In our view, a comprehensive and adequate solution to the IPP problem can only be achieved by primary legislation that deals retrospectively with the continued operation of the sentence and that allows a resentencing exercise to be undertaken. Paragraph 151)
Government Response
A response document is linked to this report, dated 9 February 2023. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document ↗