Select committee: Justice Committee

Conclusion 1

Third Report - IPP sentences Published 28 Sep 2022 Paragraph 38 Addressed to Ministry of Justice
Conclusion (the committee's words)
Given the extensive and complex nature of the challenges faced by IPP sentenced individuals, we find the absence of detail in the IPP Action Plan surprising. It lacks a clear strategic priority and ownership, as well as operational detail, timeframes, and performance measures.

From: Justice Committee, Third Report - IPP sentences (HC 266), paragraph 38, 28 September 2022

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 9 February 2023 (deadline 28 November 2022).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The Government accepts or partially accepts several recommendations, including a refreshed IPP Action Plan, but rejects resentencing and a shorter licence period, stating that resentencing would give rise to "an unacceptable risk to public protection".

  • On the primary recommendation, the Government "has no plans to conduct a resentencing exercise", and states that the updated IPP Action Plan "remains the best option" for progression towards safe release.
  • It accepts the recommendation for a new IPP Action Plan with clear performance measures, and says MoJ and HMPPS "will provide full details of the refreshed action plan and associated governance within the timeframe set out by the Committee" (by the end of Q1 2023).
  • It rejects reducing the licence termination eligibility period from 10 to five years, but says it "will review the policy and practice for suspending supervision in appropriate cases".
  • On recall, it partially accepts and does not accept that IPP offenders are recalled unnecessarily. It has asked the Chief Inspector of Probation to conduct a thematic inspection in 2023/24, and will share the Terms of Reference with the Committee once confirmed and agreed.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error