Select committee: Justice Committee

Recommendation 5

Tenth Report - Public opinion and understanding of sentencing Published 25 Oct 2023 Paragraph 42 Addressed to Ministry of Justice
Recommendation (the committee's words)
It is vital that the public has access to current data on sentencing practice so individual cases can be understood in their broader context. The MoJ should review its statistical releases on sentencing to ensure that they are presented in a format that is easily accessible and relevant to members of the public. Statistical releases should be accompanied by analysis and commentary. The MoJ should also revive the digest of criminal justice statistics and ensure that this reflects trends in sentencing and issues subject to public debate.

From: Justice Committee, Tenth Report - Public opinion and understanding of sentencing (HC 305), paragraph 42, 25 October 2023

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 18 January 2024 (deadline 25 December 2023).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government welcomes the Committee's report and says it has "delivered, or are delivering, several initiatives" on public confidence and transparency, while leaving recommendations aimed at the Sentencing Council and the judiciary to those bodies.

  • On sentencing remarks, it has announced "a one-year trial" letting victims of rape and other serious sexual offences request the judge's sentencing remarks free of charge in the Crown Court. It does not extend this to all victims, citing cost to the taxpayer.
  • On the Victims' Code, once the Victims and Prisoners Bill has received Royal Assent, the MoJ "will be publicly consulting on an updated Victims' Code" and will consider the information on the Unduly Lenient Sentence Scheme as part of that.
  • On statistics, it says its quarterly Criminal Justice System Statistics publication provides more flexible data tools than a lengthy digest would, and that it "will continue to consider options" for broader visual presentations.
  • On terminology, it "share[s] the objective" of accessible sentencing language and awaits the Sentencing Academy's work. On press judges, it says any consideration is "not for government but a matter for the judiciary".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error