Source · Select Committees · Justice Committee
Recommendation 19
19
Deferred
Unclear implementation details of the earned progression scheme raise serious concerns.
Conclusion
The Sentencing Bill 2024–25 aims to move towards an ‘earned progression scheme’, where eligible prisoners could be released earlier. However, as the Bill is currently drafted, it is unclear as to how this scheme will work in practice, especially as to whether as the Independent Sentencing Review set out, it is contingent on whether they have engaged constructively with the regime. We are concerned by the Government’s ambition to effectively implement any such scheme, given the evidence we have heard regarding failures to provide purposeful activity and time out of cell. (Conclusion, Paragraph 89)
Government Response Summary
The government's response details changes to the prison education budget, including anticipated reductions in delivery hours, and efforts to maintain quality and efficiency in education. It does not address the recommendation's concerns about the viability and implementation of the 'earned progression scheme'.
Government Response
Deferred
HM Government
Deferred
88. The national prison education budget has not been cut. However, the cost of delivering high-quality education has increased significantly in recent years. Although the budget has slightly increased in cash terms, it has not kept pace with these rising costs. This has meant in some prisons are facing a reduction in education delivery hours. 89. To ensure the service remains affordable and sustainable, we have had to make difficult decisions to focus the curriculum more effectively and are working closely with providers to maximise value for money. As a result, some reductions in the volume of Core Education delivered will be necessary from October 2025. We anticipate a national reduction of around 20–25%, subject to final analysis. 90. A revised funding formula has been introduced to ensure fair allocation based on prison population and regional cost differences. This means some prisons will experience greater reductions, while others will see increases. These changes apply only to Core Education contracts and do not affect other education services such as libraries, careers advice, distance learning, or vocational training delivered through industries and workshops. Future funding is depending on cross-Government spending decisions. We will continue to work on how to maximise delivery for the funding available. 91. To improve prison education, we are investing in digital infrastructure, new assessment tools, and specialist staff to ensure that every pound spent delivers the greatest possible impact for learners. Governors will retain flexibility to commission additional provision through the Prison Education Dynamic Purchasing System to meet the needs of their local prisoner cohort. 92. Our priority is to protect quality and focus on the most effective interventions. New Prison Education Service contracts set clearer expectations for screening and assessment, including support for learners with additional learning needs. New digital systems will expand access to secure online content, reduce repeated assessments, and improve tracking of learner progress. To further mitigate pressures, we are also asking governors to maximise attendance and classroom capacity so that the impact of reduced delivery volumes on prisoner participation is minimised. 93. We are developing a strategy to evaluate prison education, which will inform future delivery plans. We welcome engagement with the Justice Select Committee as insights emerge.