Select committee: Justice Committee

Conclusion 19

7th Report – Ending the cycle of reoffending – part one: rehabilitation in prisons Published 14 Nov 2025 Addressed to Ministry of Justice
Conclusion (the committee's words)
The Sentencing Bill 2024–25 aims to move towards an ‘earned progression scheme’, where eligible prisoners could be released earlier. However, as the Bill is currently drafted, it is unclear as to how this scheme will work in practice, especially as to whether as the Independent Sentencing Review set out, it is contingent on whether they have engaged constructively with the regime. We are concerned by the Government’s ambition to effectively implement any such scheme, given the evidence we have heard regarding failures to provide purposeful activity and time out of cell. (Conclusion, Paragraph 89)

From: Justice Committee, 7th Report – Ending the cycle of reoffending – part one: rehabilitation in prisons (HC 469), 14 November 2025

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 30 January 2026 (deadline 14 January 2026).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The Government states that it has accepted ten of the Committee's recommendations, partially accepted twelve and rejected four, and sets out its reasons for the rejections in the response.

  • On workforce data, the Government rejects publishing vacancy rates, retirement eligibility and skilled worker visa figures separately, saying existing publications cover related data and that visa publication is "not deemed to be a cost-effective use of public money".
  • On a prison workforce plan, it accepts the recommendation to publish one, but says the "format and timing" will be determined "in the coming months".
  • It accepts training on procurement and contract management for Governors, stating that "All Prison Governors will receive practical training and support on procurement and contract management within 12 months."
  • It rejects publishing time out of cell data for every prison, concluding that such a metric "would be challenging" and preferring to measure time spent in purposeful activity.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error