Select committee: Justice Committee

Bailiffs: Enforcement of debt inquiry

Closed Opened 13 Dec 2018 Closed 5 Nov 2019
Inquiry scope (the committee's words)
The Committee are inquiring into the enforcement of debt by bailiffs (also known as enforcement agents) in England and Wales. The Committee wishes to understand the impact of the 2014 enforcement agent reforms introduced by the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, and whether improvements should be made. Terms of Reference The Justice Committee has agreed to carry out an inquiry into the enforcement of debt by bailiffs (also known as enforcement agents) in England and Wales. The Committee will investigate the following topics: What was the impact of the 2014 enforcement agent reforms introduced by the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007? Why has there been an increase in complaints regarding enforcement agents? Is the fee structure working to encourage enforcement agents and debtors to settle at an early stage and to minimise the financial impact on debtors? Does the current system of self-regulation work as intended, and if not, should enforcement agents by regulated by an independent regulator? The inquiry will focus on High Court and Civil Enforcement officers. The Ministry of Justice is carrying out its own call for evidence into the 2014 enforcement agent reforms. Their call for evidence runs to 17 February 2019. In order to avoid duplication, the Justice Committee is not publishing a call for written evidence. Further information If you have questions about this inquiry please contact the inquiry manager, Fiona Hoban ( hobanf@parliament.uk ).

Where it stands

The inquiry is closed, opened 13 December 2018.

The committee has published 2 reports, most recently 17th Report - Bailiffs: Enforcement of debt on 11 April 2019.

The government's response to each report

17th Report - Bailiffs: Enforcement of debt

No government response is linked to this report.

17th Report - Bailiffs: Enforcement of debt (Enhanced HTML)

Published 16 December 2022.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The Government welcomes the report, agrees with the Committee on the need for a clearer independent complaints process and increased regulation, and does not think it necessary "at this stage" to legislate for a statutory regulator.

  • On complaints, the Government agrees "in principle" that all complaints escalated beyond local procedures should be able to go to an independent body, and "notes" the recommendation on the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman.
  • On regulation, it supports the Enforcement Conduct Board and does not think legislation is "necessary at this stage", but will review the Board within two years and "consider then whether legislative changes are needed".
  • On fees, it agrees that the fee structure should be reviewed and "intend[s] to carry out a further review" of encouraging settlement at the compliance stage and of whether fee levels remain appropriate.
  • On body-worn cameras, it agrees with the recommendation and "intend[s] to consult next year" on making them a statutory requirement for privately employed enforcement agents, alongside best practice guidance.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error

Recommendations and conclusions 0 shown

No recommendations or conclusions are indexed for this inquiry yet.

Reports

2 reports

Oral evidence sessions

2 sessions

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

Date Session and witnesses Source
26 Feb 2019
Oral evidence session
No witnesses recorded
View ↗
15 Jan 2019
Oral evidence session
No witnesses recorded
View ↗

Correspondence

2 letters

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.