Select committee: Industry and Regulators Committee

Conclusion 27

1st Report - The affluent and the effluent: cleaning up failures in water and sewage regulation Published 22 Mar 2023 Paragraph 198
Conclusion (the committee's words)
A huge level of investment—that the Government has estimated will cost £56 billion over 25 years—is required so that storm overflows are only used in times of exceptional weather. Given that water companies are responsible for maintaining their own sewage networks, they must bear a significant degree of responsibility for the necessary investment costs. However, we recognise that the scale of investment needed is vast, and for the private sector to meet this challenge there will need to be stable, long-term funding arrangements that provide certainty for investors.

From: Industry and Regulators Committee, 1st Report - The affluent and the effluent: cleaning up failures in water and sewage regulation, paragraph 198, 22 March 2023

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 5 June 2023 (deadline 22 May 2023).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The Government points to its Plan for Water and Environmental Improvement Plan as addressing many of the Committee's recommendations, and responds to each recommendation in turn, with some positions stated and others referred to those plans.

  • On the Strategic Policy Statement, the Government "does not intend to update the SPS", citing Ofwat's ongoing 2024 Price Review process (PR24).
  • On a single social tariff, the response states "There are no plans to introduce a single social tariff".
  • On wet wipes, the Government says it "will change the law to ban the sale of wet wipes containing plastic, subject to public consultation".
  • On storm overflows, the Government says it has committed to review the Discharge Reduction Plan in 2027, so that companies "remain as ambitious as possible, while balancing the impact on bills".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error