Select committee: Work and Pensions Committee

Recommendation 6

Fourth Report - Statutory Sick Pay Published 28 Mar 2024 Paragraph 55 Addressed to Department for Work and Pensions
Recommendation (the committee's words)
The overall impact on business of reforming Statutory Sick Pay is hard to predict, but even if it did not result in the kind of net benefits some have predicted, we believe that larger businesses would be able to absorb the costs of the modest reforms we have recommended. For smaller businesses, however, a rebate of SSP costs would be an essential component of any set of reforms. If made conditional, such a rebate could also encourage businesses to manage sickness absences better. A conditional rebate would also align neatly with the Government’s recent commitments to improving access to occupational health services for employees of small businesses, and could be introduced alongside those other changes. The Government should consult small and medium-sized businesses on the design of a small business rebate for Statutory Sick Pay, including the eligibility criteria and any conditions that could apply, and introduce the rebate along with the other reforms we have recommended ahead of financial year 2025–26.

From: Work and Pensions Committee, Fourth Report - Statutory Sick Pay (HC 148), paragraph 55, 28 March 2024

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 14 May 2024 (deadline 28 May 2024).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The Government states that it "firmly believes that there is a case to strengthen SSP" and is delivering changes through the Employment Rights Bill, while it does not adopt the Committee's recommendations to keep the waiting period or to raise the SSP rate in line with Statutory Maternity Pay.

  • On the Lower Earnings Limit, the Government is extending eligibility to those earning below it, and has brought forward an amendment setting the rate at "80% of average normal weekly earnings, or the flat rate, whichever is lower". It says this means "up to 1.3 million more employees" become eligible.
  • On the waiting period, the Government notes the recommendation came under the previous administration and says it "will remove the three-day waiting period from the SSP system through the Employment Rights Bill".
  • On the SSP rate, the Government does not commit to align it with Statutory Maternity Pay, citing an estimated additional cost of "c.£500 million per year" to business. It says it "continues to review the rate of SSP each year as part of the annual uprating process".
  • On a small business rebate, the response notes the Percentage Threshold Scheme was "seen as administratively complex and was underused" and points to the independent Keep Britain Working review. On agency workers, it will update guidance "in due course".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error