Select committee: Work and Pensions Committee

Recommendation 16

Third Report: Universal Credit: the wait for a first payment Published 19 Oct 2020 Paragraph 80 Addressed to Department for Work and Pensions
Recommendation (the committee's words)
The starter payments we have recommended would also be available to people making claims under the Special Rules for Terminal Illness. We recommend that the Department consider what further support it could offer to people making claims for Universal Credit under the Special Rules for Terminal Illness. That might include paying the starter payment more quickly on receipt of a DS1500 form; offering a larger starter payment to people making claims under the Special Rules; or proactively offering backdating (beyond the current limit of a month) of claims to people diagnosed with a terminal illness who have, understandably, not made a claim immediately on becoming eligible.

From: Work and Pensions Committee, Third Report: Universal Credit: the wait for a first payment (HC 204), paragraph 80, 19 October 2020

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 12 January 2021 (deadline 19 December 2020).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The Government notes the Committee's report and, in the sections summarised here, declines to adopt most of its main recommendations, saying that advances mean "No one has to wait five weeks for a payment".

  • On research into the impact of the wait, the Department states that it "will not be conducting nor commissioning any research", saying resources were reallocated to the COVID-19 response.
  • On a starter payment, the Government says there "is not a need for a starter payment in UC" because New Claim Advances are available, and cites increased fraud risk. It says it will "not be introducing" more frequent payments by default.
  • On the deduction cap, it points to the lowering from 30% to 25% of the standard allowance, "effective from October 2021", and says further lowering "would not be an effective way to protect vulnerable claimants".
  • It states that it "does not agree that monthly updates" on Work Coach recruitment are appropriate, but will ensure "relevant updates" are supplied to Parliament. It also reports a commitment to increase Work Coaches by 13,500 by end of March 2021.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error