Select committee: Work and Pensions Committee

Recommendation 13

Second Report - Disability employment gap Published 30 Jul 2021 Paragraph 61 Addressed to Department for Work and Pensions
Recommendation (the committee's words)
The evidence we heard in favour of Individual Placement and Support (IPS) as a model of employment support is overwhelmingly positive. We welcome the fact that the Department has invested in trials of IPS. We urge the Department to bring forward publication of its analysis of data from these trials and to adopt IPS as a model for its employment support offer. We welcome the work that the joint Work and Health Unit has done so far on expanding the use of IPS, and DWP should continue to work with DHSC and NHS England on this.

From: Work and Pensions Committee, Second Report - Disability employment gap (HC 189), paragraph 61, 30 July 2021

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 22 November 2021 (deadline 30 September 2021).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government says it shares the Committee's aim and is progressing its reforms, but keeps its existing goal of one million more disabled people in work by 2027 rather than adopting the Committee's proposed targets.

  • On targets, it says it has "goals" rather than targets, because external factors affect disability employment, and that a 1.2 million goal is "very unlikely to halve the gap".
  • On workforce reporting by large employers, it points to a Cabinet Office consultation, exploring "both voluntary and mandated workplace transparency", as "the right next step".
  • On Disability Confident, it will review levels 2 and 3 and "consider" how to measure the scheme's impact and success, and says the review will provide an opportunity to seek views on external assessment.
  • On the Work Capability Assessment, it says detailed proposals will be set out in a White Paper in 2022 following analysis of Green Paper responses.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error