Select committee: Work and Pensions Committee

The cost of living

Closed Opened 13 Jan 2022 Closed 17 Apr 2023 9 recommendations 2 conclusions
Inquiry scope (the committee's words)
The Committee has held oral evidence sessions on the cost of living in February and March 2022. It is now seeking written evidence on how the Government can support people on Universal Credit, legacy benefits and the state pension through the next year. Read the call for evidence to learn more about the inquiry.

Where it stands

The inquiry is closed, opened 13 January 2022.

The committee has published 1 report, most recently Second Report - The Cost of Living on 27 July 2022.

The government's response

Published 8 September 2022. The deadline was 27 September 2022.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) sets out its position on the Committee's recommendations on the cost of living, declining several (including a review of benefit adequacy and a written Pension Credit strategy) while describing existing communications work and support measures.

  • On benefit uprating, DWP says it "will not be making any IT changes" to legacy benefits as they close, and that there are "no plans to change the up-rating period", because a consistent period means peaks and troughs "even out over time".
  • The Government says it does not intend to conduct a specific review of benefit adequacy; in the autumn the Secretary of State will undertake her statutory annual up-rating review and may increase benefits "if she considers it appropriate".
  • On the benefit cap, the Government says the cost-of-living payment is exempt from it, and that the Secretary of State "is reviewing further advice on this". It gives no date.
  • On Pension Credit, DWP "does not consider that a written strategy or targets for take-up" are required, citing existing work with organisations; it is "looking at processes" that might be simplified but says automatic awards are not possible.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error

Recommendations and conclusions

All 11 recommendations and conclusions

Reports

All reports

Evidence

  • 2 oral evidence sessionsLatest 9 March 2022
  • 12 witnesses
All evidence

Recent activity

Recommendations and conclusions 11 shown

Conclusion 1

Conclusion · Second Report - The Cost of Living · Addressed to Department for Work and Pensions

Concluded (the committee's words)
The Committee welcomes the Government’s swift action and range of measures introduced in response to the cost of living crisis. It is clear that these will offset some of the increased costs for households living in poverty. However, we have heard very concerning evidence about the impact of the crisis on disabled people, older people, carers and larger families in particular.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 2

Recommendation · Second Report - The Cost of Living · Addressed to Department for Work and Pensions

Recommended (the committee's words)
We recommend that the Department for Work and Pensions engage with the organisations mentioned throughout this report to assess what further or more direct support needs to be provided to any of these groups as the cost of living continues to rise. We also urge the Government to simplify the support mechanisms to ensure households understand what support they are entitled to and enable them to chase up receipt.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 3

Recommendation · Second Report - The Cost of Living · Addressed to Department for Work and Pensions

Recommended (the committee's words)
We welcome the inclusion of those on legacy benefits in the Government’s support measures. We recognise that there are logistical difficulties in getting the necessary support in place quickly, but the Government does not seem to have taken on board our previous recommendations to improve systems. While we understand that in this case one-off payments may have been quicker to put in place, and able to reach more people, we agree with the Secretary of State’s opinion from 2021 that they are not the preferred approach. We recommend that other options, such as more responsive benefit uprating, are prioritised in future.

Link to this item · Read this item

Conclusion 4

Conclusion · Second Report - The Cost of Living · Addressed to Department for Work and Pensions

Concluded (the committee's words)
The systems that legacy benefits run on are not fit for purpose. It is disappointing that the Department has not adapted its IT systems to allow for flexibility in uprating these benefits to respond to national events. The Department has scheduled and then delayed the migration of claimants from legacy benefits onto Universal Credit several times and the current date to complete this process for many is the end of 2024, leaving legacy benefits still in use for a considerable period. The Department must be able to uprate legacy benefits swiftly in times of high inflation. The Department should also publish (or at least provide to the Committee) for each benefit the details of the process, complexities and time required for the uprating exercise. We repeat our recommendation that the DWP work to increase the speed with which changes can be made to legacy benefit and state pension rates.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 5

Recommendation · Second Report - The Cost of Living · Addressed to Department for Work and Pensions

Recommended (the committee's words)
While an annual uprating is workable and effective at times of stable inflation, it is not appropriate in more volatile economic circumstances and is causing people real hardship. In the medium-term the Department should reduce the length of time between the inflation reference period and the uprating implementation date to allow more flexibility in the system, preferably to the previous quarter end or more recent if possible.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 6

Recommendation · Second Report - The Cost of Living · Addressed to Department for Work and Pensions

Recommended (the committee's words)
Whilst £1.5 billion for the Household Support Fund is welcome, we are concerned that there is no information available to indicate where this funding is going, The cost of living 37 and whether or not it is supporting the most vulnerable households effectively. Discretionary funding should not replace core funding. Where the Government continues to use discretionary funds, it should ensure councils are well supported to deliver the funding to the households who need it the most. We ask the Department to publish information on what local authorities have spent this funding on to date by the end of September 2022.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 7

Recommendation · Second Report - The Cost of Living · Addressed to Department for Work and Pensions

Recommended (the committee's words)
The Housing Support Fund was designed to be a short-term measure but is now in its third funding cycle. While we all hope to see far more stability in the economy in coming years, the need for such funds highlights that benefits are already set at subsistence levels for most, leaving no capacity for individuals to cope with short term shocks. A more responsive uprating system would help to address this. We recommend that, by the end of this Parliament, the Government review the adequacy of benefit levels and publish its findings. This should include a specific review of the adequacy of disability benefits and should consider whether it is appropriate to continue to rely on discretionary funds and one-off payments.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 8

Recommendation · Second Report - The Cost of Living · Addressed to Department for Work and Pensions

Recommended (the committee's words)
The reset of Local Housing Allowance to cover the 30th percentile of rents was a welcome intervention at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, but the increase has since been eroded by rising housing costs. Some parts of the country are experiencing acute shortages of affordable housing, and we have heard this is leaving some unable to move on from temporary accommodation. DWP should work with other Departments to make housing more affordable for those on low incomes, as it did in 2020. This must include an increase to Local Housing Allowance to ensure that it supports people on low incomes to access secure, affordable housing in their local area.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 9

Recommendation · Second Report - The Cost of Living · Addressed to Department for Work and Pensions

Recommended (the committee's words)
We welcome the decision by the Government to exempt the cost of living payments from the benefit cap so that those most in need of support can receive it. This decision suggests, however, that the Department knows that the cap is set too low to effectively cover households’ now spiralling costs of living. Regardless of the changes made when the Fixed Term Parliaments Act was repealed, it was clearly not the intention of the original legislation that the benefit cap go more than six years without even being reviewed, let alone adjusted for inflation. The benefit cap should be reviewed urgently—and certainly no later than the end of 2022—to ensure it is in line with average household incomes and increasing rent/energy/food costs—the results of this review should be published. Furthermore, the cap must be uprated this year.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 10

Recommendation · Second Report - The Cost of Living · Addressed to Department for Work and Pensions

Recommended (the committee's words)
Deductions from the Department are contributing to hardship for struggling households, who are already trying to tackle rising costs. We have heard that for some, deductions are pushing them into destitution and leading them to depend on food banks. The Government has urged creditors to accept reduced monthly payments or write off debts, but isn’t following its own advice. We recommend that deductions are paused, and then only restored gradually as the rate of inflation 38 The cost of living reduces, or when benefits have been uprated to reflect the current rate of inflation. If the Government is not willing to pause deductions then it must increase awareness of existing options such as short-term pauses, and ensure that those who are struggling can get accessible and practical debt advice. The Government should also consider the Committee’s recommendations on deductions and debt in our 2020 ‘Universal Credit–the wait for a first payment’ report. We would welcome a response by the end of 2022.

Link to this item · Read this item

Recommendation 11

Recommendation · Second Report - The Cost of Living · Addressed to Department for Work and Pensions

Recommended (the committee's words)
Pension Credit provides vital support for pensioners, yet some 850,000 eligible households do not claim it. The rising cost of living means this must now be urgently addressed. The Government’s efforts are focused on a communications campaign. The Committee heard, however, that this was unlikely to be enough. We recommend that the Government work with key stakeholders, including local authorities, to develop a written strategy to increase take-up by the end of 2022. This should include a plan for the most effective ways to identify households likely to be eligible and support them to claim. The Government should also explore ways to simplify or automate parts of the claiming process. The strategy should have clear aims, including a target for take- up, as well as a timeline of actions to be taken to achieve this and confirmation of how the strategy will be funded. The Government should provide an annual update to the select committee on achievements to date and any amendments to the strategy.

Link to this item · Read this item

Reports

1 report

Oral evidence sessions

2 sessions

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

Date Session and witnesses Source
9 Mar 2022
Work and Pensions Committee
Aveek Bhattacharya · Social Market Foundation, Jack Monroe, James Heywood · Centre for Policy Studies, Julian Jessop, Mike Brewer · Resolution Foundation, Morgan Vine · Independent Age, Peter Smith · National Energy Action
View ↗
9 Feb 2022
Work and Pensions Committee
Morgan Wild · Citizens Advice, Peter Matejic · Joseph Rowntree Foundation, Robert Joyce · Institute for Fiscal Studies, Rory Weal · Trussell Trust, Rt Hon Thérèse Coffey MP · Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
View ↗

Who gave evidence

12 witnesses

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

WitnessOrganisationSessions
Aveek Bhattacharya · Chief Economist Social Market Foundation 1
Jack Monroe Not recorded 1
James Heywood · Head of Welfare and Opportunity Centre for Policy Studies 1
Julian Jessop Not recorded 1
Mike Brewer · Deputy Chief Executive Resolution Foundation 1
Morgan Vine · Director of Policy and Influencing Independent Age 1
Morgan Wild · Head of Policy Citizens Advice 1
Peter Matejic · Chief Analyst, Insight and Policy Joseph Rowntree Foundation 1
Peter Smith · Director of Policy and Advocacy National Energy Action 1
Robert Joyce · Deputy Director and Head of the Income, Work and Welfare sector Institute for Fiscal Studies 1
Rory Weal · Senior Policy and Public Affairs Manager Trussell Trust 1
Rt Hon Thérèse Coffey MP · Secretary of State Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs 1

Correspondence

3 letters

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.