Understanding the new State Pension inquiry
Closed
What the inquiry looked at
“Government Response Communication of the new state pension: Government Response to the Committee’s Eighth Report of Session 2015–16 Communication of the new state pension: Government Response to the Committee’s Eighth Report of Session 2015–16 (PDF 157KB) Final Report Communication of the new state pension Communication of the new state pension (PDF 1.13MB) Second Interim Report Communication of state pension age changes Communication of state pension age changes (PDF 2.7MB) First Interim Report Understanding the new State Pension - interim report on pension statements Understanding the new State Pension - interim report on pension statements (PDF 1.3MB) Inquiry background The new State Pension is being introduced in April 2016. Concerns have been raised that many of those who will be affected by the changes do not know enough about the changes or exactly what they will mean for their pensions, especially people who are close to retirement now and may have done most or all of their retirement planning and saving under the "old" system. The Committee invites written evidence on the way the Government has communicated the changes, and the issues people are facing in understanding the transition to the new State Pension. Terms of reference: Understanding the new State Pension”
The committee's words, from the inquiry page on parliament.uk ↗.
What it found
The new state pension, which will be introduced for people reaching state pension age on or after 6 April 2016, is a welcome simplification of an over complicated system.
Over time, more and more pensioners will receive a single flat rate. During transition, however, the majority will not. This has not been made sufficiently clear in Government communications that have focused on the full flat rate of £155.65, contributing to confusion about the new system. Many people who will not lose out from the new state pension, including most people who have had periods of contracting out and many women born between 6 April 1951 and 5 April 1953, wrongly believe they will.
Three groups in particular stand to receive less in the early years of the new state pension than they would notionally have received under the current system:
• people with fewer than 10 years of qualifying contributions; • people, largely women, who would currently derive rights to a pension based on their spouse’s contributions and are not covered by transitional protection; and • people who built up large guaranteed minimum pensions during the period from 1978 to 1988 and will reach state pension age during the early years of the new state pension.
The losses are largely products of the simplification of an outdated and extraordinarily complex system. It is those complexities, however, that make explaining the consequences to those affected imperative. The Government should not rely on general awareness campaigns. We recommend the DWP directly contact those affected, and others with gaps in their contribution records, explaining their personal circumstances and offering a telephone hotline to discuss with an expert the most appropriate strategy for increasing state pension entitlement.
The Department has rightly upped its efforts to explain the more complex elements of the reforms and made clear recent headway in establishing an online system for state pension statements. In order to best plan for retirement, however, individuals need to see a complete picture of their state, workplace and personal pensions in one place. We welcome the Government’s commitment to the creation of a pensions dashboard by 2019, in line with our previous recommendation, and will follow progress with interest.
We are concerned by the Government’s reliance on individuals requesting a state pension statement or generating one on a website. This risks missing those who most need to plan financially for retirement. We recommend that people aged 50 or over, unless they opt out on the digital system, should be sent annual state pension statements.
What the government said
8th Report - Communication of the new state pension
No government response is linked to this report.
7th Report - Communication of state pension age changes
No government response is linked to this report.
6th Report - Understanding the new state pension – interim report on pension statements
No government response is linked to this report.
How the inquiry ran
Each dot is a dated item listed on this page, from the inquiry's opening on 21 October 2015 to its close on 3 October 2019.
- Oral evidence 3 sessions
- Report 3 reports
- Correspondence 4 letters
What it recommended 6 recommendations · 16 conclusions
12We recommend that the following changes are made to state pension statements immediately: • statements...
1We strongly support state pension age equalisation and increases in the state pension age as...
2We will never know how many women did not know, or could not be reasonably...
3Reverting to the state pension ages in place before the 1995 Pensions Act would be...
4Extending the timetable for increases in the state pension age or widening eligibility for pension...
5We are long past the stage where an ideal outcome to the necessary process of...
6We are interested in an idea that was proposed of permitting early retirement, from a...
7There are several questions which would need to be addressed before such an idea could...
8As this was not the focus of our inquiry the committee has not taken much...
9The state pension age will inevitably rise again.
10The Government’s pensions strategy is predicated on people better engaging with financial planning and saving...
1The new state pension is a welcome simplification of an overcomplicated system.
2People with periods of contracting out typically gain from the new state pension.
3Women born between 6 April 1951 and 5 April 1953 will not be eligible for...
4Three groups in particular stand to receive less in the early years of the new...
5The losses are largely products of the simplification of an outdated and extraordinarily complex system.
6The Department has rightly upped its efforts to explain the more complex elements of the...
7The Government aspires to promote greater private pension saving.
8We recommend that, as a matter of urgency, the Department write to people it projects...
9We recommend the Government provide a new state pension telephone hotline service for the recipients...
10The Government’s pensions strategy is predicated on people engaging more with their pension savings and...
11We recommend the Government sends automatic state pension statements to all people aged 50 and...
Evidence
Oral evidence sessions 3
- 18 Jan 2016No witnesses recordedparliament.uk ↗
- 16 Dec 2015No witnesses recordedparliament.uk ↗
- 25 Nov 2015No witnesses recordedparliament.uk ↗
Correspondence 4 letters
- 27 Feb 2017Letter to Richard Harrington MP re direct mail and the new state pension 09-01-17From committee
- 3 Feb 2017Frank Field to Richard Harrington re state pension digital statements 02-02-2017
- 1 Feb 2017Letter from Richard Harrington MP to Chair re direct mail approach 23-01-2017To committee
- 16 Dec 2015Letter from Baroness Altmann on Understanding the new State Pension 1-12-2015To committee