Select committee: Women and Equalities Committee

Fourth Report - Accessibility of products and services to disabled people

HC 605 Published 19 March 2024

At a glance5 recommendations and 4 conclusions · Government response published 29 May 2024

The government's response

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government's response sets out existing work on each area, says it is "pleased" to restart the Extra Costs Taskforce, and states that legislative options on private sector website accessibility "are no longer available" at this stage of the Parliamentary session.

  • On Disability and Access Ambassadors, the government says the programme is designed to be DAA-led, not for "officials tasking DAAs with specific deliverables", and that research into private sector accessibility is to be published in spring 2024.
  • On the Extra Costs Taskforce, the government is "pleased that we can restart the work"; the Disability Unit is working up a project plan and will engage stakeholders "in due course". No establishment date is stated.
  • On private sector websites, DSIT has convened a cross-Whitehall ministerial group and, "where appropriate", will seek to incorporate lessons from the public sector regulations into its consideration of private sector web accessibility.
  • On food packaging, the government says it is "keen to look at" the issue and is "interested in seeing how these trials work in the first instance", noting factors such as cost and practical viability.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error

Sources

Recommendations and conclusions 9

  1. 1
    Unacceptable delay in government accessibility research for disabled consumers persists Conclusion · paragraph 15 · addressed to Government Equalities Office Conclusion (the committee's words)
    The Disability Action Plan calls on the Disability Unit to publish research into the accessibility of private sector products and services in spring 2024 and to improve its understanding of the barriers disabled consumers face. It is right that policy options should be evidence-based However, despite the hold ups owing to legal proceedings, it is unacceptable that three years after the publication of the National Disability Strategy, rather than seeing tangible improvements in their lives, disabled consumers are instead left with further delay while waiting for the Government to undertake research, the need for which has long been recognised.
  2. 2
    Businesses neglect inclusive design for disabled consumers, limiting market access Conclusion · paragraph 16 · addressed to Government Equalities Office Conclusion (the committee's words)
    Not all businesses are considering the needs of disabled consumers when bringing products and services to the market. Where accessibility is considered, it is often done so retrospectively, as something to be bolted on to an existing design. Products and services should be inclusive by default. By not embracing inclusive design, businesses risk missing out on the spending power of disabled consumers and restricting the options available to them.
  3. 3
    Task Disability and Access Ambassadors to engage businesses on inclusive design best practice Recommendation · paragraph 17 · addressed to Government Equalities Office Recommendation (the committee's words)
    The Government should task the Disability and Access Ambassadors with engaging with businesses on inclusive design, to seek out and share best practice and to identify the barriers to making products and services in their sectors accessible to disabled people. The Government should then work with each sector to discuss relevant interventions and develop guidance on best practice.
  4. 4
    Establish Extra Costs Taskforce by summer 2024 to understand disabled people's daily expenses Recommendation · paragraph 18 · addressed to Government Equalities Office Recommendation (the committee's words)
    Disabled people face additional costs in their daily lives. These costs are exacerbated by restrictions on their choice as consumers. We support the Government’s commitment in the National Disability Strategy to establish an Extra Costs Taskforce to better understand the extra costs faced by disabled people, including how this breaks down for different impairments. The Government originally planned to set up the taskforce by summer 2022. We recommend that the Government establish an Extra Costs Taskforce as a priority and by no later than summer 2024.
  5. 5
    Market forces fail to improve online accessibility for disabled people Conclusion · paragraph 27 · addressed to Government Equalities Office Conclusion (the committee's words)
    Disabled people should not have to look for alternatives or settle for less when using online shopping and services. Despite the untapped potential of the purple pound, market forces have failed to drive the urgent improvements that are necessary.
  6. 6
    Regulate essential private sector websites and applications to public sector accessibility standards Recommendation · paragraph 28 · addressed to Government Equalities Office Recommendation (the committee's words)
    Given that disabled people increasingly need access to online services, information, and social networks, it is imperative that the Government acts on what it has described as the “persistently poor accessibility of private sector websites” without further delay. As a priority, private sector websites and applications which provide essential products and services should be subject to the same regulations as the public sector. Concurrently, Ministers should work with businesses, the Disability and Access Ambassadors and Disabled People’s Organisations (DPOs) to lay the ground for legislative action across the other parts of the private sector. The Government should provide an update on its progress on this recommendation within six months of the publication of this report.
  7. 7
    Inconsistent accessibility for disabled customers across banking services and ATMs Conclusion · paragraph 34 · addressed to Government Equalities Office Conclusion (the committee's words)
    Several banks and financial providers have innovated to make their services accessible to blind and partially sighted customers, such as issuing debit and credit cards with tactile indicators. However, this is not standard practice across the banking sector as providers continue to phase out embossed cards. We are also concerned that not all banks properly consider the needs of disabled people in the provision of ATMs.
  8. 8
    Mandate banks to adopt inclusive design for cards and ATMs, ensuring full accessibility Recommendation · paragraph 34 · addressed to Government Equalities Office Recommendation (the committee's words)
    The Financial Conduct Authority should work with the retail banking sector and organisations such as the RNIB to ensure all banks embrace inclusive design from the outset when innovating or phasing out existing services. We recommend that all banks: • roll out flat bank cards that are accessible to disabled people, and continue to issue embossed cards to customers who request them; • in addition to tactile indicators, ensure that all flat bank cards have a clear visual design, including colour, good contrast and large font size; and • where ATMs are provided, ensure they have been user tested with disabled people, installed in locations accessible to all and are regularly checked to guarantee that accessible features are in working order.
  9. 9
    Review food packaging guidance to ensure minimum accessibility for essential information Recommendation · paragraph 37 · addressed to Government Equalities Office Recommendation (the committee's words)
    The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs should review its food packaging guidance in light of new technological approaches being developed and ensure a minimum accessibility requirement on food packaging’s essential nutrition, health and pricing information.