Source · Select Committees · Women and Equalities Committee

Recommendation 2

2 Accepted

Require significant state intervention to increase access to finance for female founders.

Conclusion
The prize of £250 billion plus in potential growth is one that the Government should throw everything it has at pursuing. Current piecemeal initiatives have had little impact, systemic change is required. First and foremost this needs to be led by increasing access to finance for female-founders. Evidence has shown that this will not happen organically, and, as demonstrated elsewhere by countries such as Canada, significant state intervention is required. (Conclusion, Paragraph 35)
Government Response Summary
The government highlights the existing government-led Investing in Women Code as a significant initiative for transparency and accountability, and explains why the FCA does not request reporting from venture capital firms due to proportionality and streamlining plans.
Government Response Accepted
HM Government Accepted
We welcome the Committee’s call for better transparency and accountability for investors. We would highlight the government-led Investing in Women Code as a significant initiative in this area. The Code produces an annual report on the investment landscape from across lenders, equity, and angel investors. It is evolving to improve its data collection capability with support from the Invest in Women Taskforce and will continue to champion data reporting by lenders and investors, including Venture Capital funds. The FCA collects various regulatory returns from authorised firms on a periodic basis to provide timely, accurate data to assist in meeting its statutory objective of protecting consumers, maintaining market integrity (for instance detection and prevention of market abuse and manipulation) and promoting competition. Regulatory returns also provide a fundamental baseline for the FCA to monitor and assess firms’ ability to meet its threshold conditions on an ongoing basis, e.g. via prudential returns. Since receiving its secondary international competitiveness and growth objective in 2023, the FCA has been putting growth and competitiveness at the heart of its approach. Growth is front and centre of the FCAs new strategy.3 As part of this, FCA is transforming how it works, including by streamlining data requests to reduce the burden on firms, while ensuring 3 https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/corporate/our-strategy-2025–30.pdf it has the right information to intervene where needed. In its recent letter to the Prime Minister,4 the FCA highlighted that they have recently reduced data requests for 36,000 firms, saving time and money for them. The FCA does not request reporting from venture capital firms, or other alternative investment fund managers (AIFMs), in relation to deals undertaken. FCA do not mandate which investment strategy and investment choices AIFMs should make. Rather, AIFMs are expected to comply with relevant rules in the FCA Handbook, to act as good agents by avoiding foreseeable harm and to deliver good outcomes to investors. They are also expected to act as good market participants, observing proper standards of market conduct. It should be noted that registered venture capital firms are generally smaller firms, and this recommendation would not align with the FCAs plans to streamline returns. In addition, versus regulatory reporting requested from other AIFMs and the wider population of asset managers, this request would be disproportionate and inconsistent with the FCAs overall approach to reporting. Innovate UK Response