Select committee: Women and Equalities Committee
Recommendation 7
Third Report: Unequal impact? Coronavirus and BAME people
Published 15 Dec 2020
Paragraph 51
Addressed to Government Equalities Office
Women and Equalities Committee Unequal impact? Coronavirus and BAME people All items in this report Report on parliament.uk ↗ Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗
Recommendation (the committee's words)
We understand that data sharing is voluntary. However, we believe it is the Government’s responsibility to build trust among BAME communities so that they are comfortable in volunteering data. We strongly disagree with the Minister’s approach and the resistance to deploy resources for data collection; this does not show a sustained effort to capture “a full picture”. The Government should collect, and report, disaggregated data on clinical outcomes, for instance, the share of BAME people being tested, how many have tested positive and the share of BAME people being admitted to hospital. We believe that this is essential in assessing the impact of coronavirus on BAME people; any data collected should be disaggregated by ethnic group to allow for a much more granular analysis of the problems. The Government should collect, and report, disaggregated data on clinical outcomes, for instance, the share of BAME people being tested, how many have tested positive and the share of BAME people being admitted to hospital. We believe that this is essential in assessing the impact of coronavirus on BAME people; any data collected should be disaggregated by ethnic group to allow for a much more granular analysis of the problems. This data collection should begin immediately.
From: Women and Equalities Committee, Third Report: Unequal impact? Coronavirus and BAME people (HC 384), paragraph 51, 15 December 2020
Government response
The government responded to the whole report on 5 March 2021.
Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.The government's response addresses each recommendation separately, agreeing that the COVID-19 recovery must address health inequalities while declining or not adopting several specific proposals, including the NHS Health Check age change and a new overcrowding strategy.
- On health inequalities, the government "agrees that the COVID-19 recovery must be undertaken in a way that addresses health inequalities", but it does not say it will implement the Marmot recommendations in full.
- On extending NHS Health Checks to BAME people from age 25, the government says it "would be inappropriate" to adopt the recommendation "at this stage", because an ongoing review is considering the appropriate starting age.
- On a strategy to reduce overcrowding, the government "recognises the Committee’s findings on overcrowding, but does not accept the recommendation", citing work already underway. It also says it is "not appropriate" to take work forward on a separate housing conditions strategy, citing duplication and delay.
- On Universal Credit ethnicity data, the Department for Work and Pensions says it "does not have the legal power to mandate" this, and that primary legislation would be required. On Statutory Sick Pay for zero-hours workers, it says extension would require new primary legislation.