Source · Select Committees · Women and Equalities Committee
Recommendation 7
7
Rejected
Paragraph: 70
Review Country Policy Information Team performance and introduce training for CPIN interpretation.
Recommendation
We recommend the Home Office conduct a review of the performance of the Country Policy Information Team, including its ability to maintain and update high quality CPINs in a timely manner. We further recommend the Home Office introduce a new programme of training for asylum decision-makers and presenting officers on correctly using and interpreting CPINs in the claim determination process.
Government Response Summary
The government rejects the recommendation to conduct a review of the Country Policy and Information Team's performance, stating it is not necessary. Regarding training, it notes that decision-makers receive a bespoke module on CPIN use as part of the current training programme, and work is underway to review and improve this training.
Paragraph Reference:
70
Government Response
Rejected
HM Government
Rejected
In relation to the recommendations at paragraphs 69 and 70, we consider that the Country Policy and Information Team (CPIT) can maintain and update high quality CPINs in a timely manner and that a discrete review of its performance is not necessary. CPIT produces CPINs on the main, but not all, types of protection claim from the top 20 to 30 nationalities making claims. The team keeps CPINs under regular review, aiming to update notes that continue to be relevant at least once every two years (or more regularly where necessary). It also operates an information request service where decision makers can seek information to supplement CPINs or to cover a country or issue where there is no existing CPIN. CPIT’s country information (COI) products, including CPINs, are already subject to regular review by the Independent Advisory Group on Country Information (IAGCI), which reports to the Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration (ICIBI). The IAGCI commissions third party reviewers—usually academic country experts—to check the accuracy, reliability and currency of CPIT’s COI products. The IAGCI focuses on CPINs, meeting two to three times a year covering the top 20 asylum intake countries over a two-to-three year cycle. The Group also commissions reviews of thematic issues, such as gender or sexual orientation and gender identity, on an ad hoc basis. The IAGCI reviews, and the publicly available ICIBI’s reports of these, are overwhelmingly positive and help ensure that CPIT’s COI products are generally accurate, reliable and current. Additionally, since CPINs are operational tools which are publicly available, they are routinely ‘stress-tested’ in the immigration courts and by other interested parties. CPIT uses feedback from this public scrutiny to update and revise its CPINs where necessary. Our decisions strive to be well reasoned and properly consider the evidence provided by the claimant against available country information. Our processes are underpinned by a robust framework of safeguards and quality checks, ensuring that claims are properly considered, decisions are sound, and that protection is granted to those who genuinely need it. As part of the current Foundation Training Programme, asylum decision makers are provided with a bespoke module which focusses on the correct use and interpretation of CPINS. Furthermore, there is currently work underway to review the training of asylum decision makers and the focus of the project is to ensure that the right training is given at the right time. The expectation is that by moving to this model it will help decision makers become more productive in a quicker timeframe as the training will be more focused on the type of cases they are going to work and the tasks they will need to undertake at that time. This will include country specific learning interventions, including utilising relevant CPINs.