Select committee: Women and Equalities Committee

Enforcing the Equality Act: the law and the role of the EHRC inquiry

Closed Opened 19 Jul 2018 Closed 19 Jul 2018
Inquiry scope (the committee's words)
The individual approach to enforcement of equality law is no longer fit for purpose, says the Women and Equalities Committee in the report of its year-long inquiry. The report argues against relying on the individual approach, dating back to the 60s and 70s, and recommends that this must be replaced by a new approach which provides a sustainable deterrent and tackles institutional and systemic discrimination. While individuals must still have the right to challenge discrimination in the courts, says the Committee, the system of enforcement should ensure that this is only rarely needed: this will require a fundamental shift in the way that enforcement of the Equality Act is thought about and applied. The Committee has already made recommendations to improve the enforcement of the Equality Act in specific areas. It now wants to know what more needs to be done to achieve widespread compliance with the Equality Act 2010 for all those with rights under it, including: the processes by which individual cases can be brought under the Equality Act, including the barriers that may prevent claimants from enforcing their rights the role of the EHRC as the enforcement body, including the effectiveness of its duties, powers and policies whether there are other models of enforcement that could achieve more widespread compliance with the rights set out in the Equality Act 2010.

Where it stands

The inquiry is closed, opened 19 July 2018.

The committee has published 1 report, most recently 10th Report - Enforcing the Equality Act: the law and the role of the Equality and Human Rights Commission on 30 July 2019.

The government's response

Published 25 October 2019.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government welcomes the Committee's recommendations on the EHRC taking more systemic enforcement action, but declines several of its proposals for new legal duties, indemnity, exemplary damages and remedial orders.

  • On enforcement bodies, the government "agrees" they are an important part of securing compliance but does "not believe that a further legal duty in this area is the best way to promote compliance". It cites the over 70 national regulators and the operational independence of regulators.
  • On indemnifying the EHRC for high-cost cases, the government says the proposal could "create moral hazard" and raise issues around the propriety of public expenditure.
  • On harassment duties, the government is consulting and "will withhold judgment" on extending a duty to all forms of harassment until the consultation process has concluded. It has already agreed to introduce a new statutory Code of Practice on sexual harassment.
  • On single-sex services, it "plans to publish" non-statutory best practice guidance, and says a statutory code is limited because "there is no case law in this space". On exemplary damages and remedial orders it has "no plans" for legislation.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error

Reports

1 report

Oral evidence sessions

8 sessions

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

Date Session and witnesses Source
5 Jun 2019
Oral evidence session
No witnesses recorded
View ↗
22 May 2019
Oral evidence session
No witnesses recorded
View ↗
8 May 2019
Oral evidence session
No witnesses recorded
View ↗
27 Mar 2019
Oral evidence session
No witnesses recorded
View ↗
30 Jan 2019
Oral evidence session
No witnesses recorded
View ↗
16 Jan 2019
Oral evidence session
No witnesses recorded
View ↗
28 Nov 2018
Oral evidence session
No witnesses recorded
View ↗
31 Oct 2018
Oral evidence session
No witnesses recorded
View ↗