Select committee: Women and Equalities Committee

High heels and workplace dress codes inquiry

Closed Opened 7 Jun 2016 Closed 7 Jun 2016
Inquiry scope (the committee's words)
The Petitions Committee and Women and Equalities Committee publish their report "High heels and workplace dress codes", revealing the troubling experiences of workers affected by discriminatory dress codes. Government Response High heels and workplace dress codes: Government Response to the First Joint Report of the Petitions Committee and the Women and Equalities Committee of Session 2016–17 High heels and workplace dress codes: Government Response to the First Joint Report of the Petitions Committee and the Women and Equalities Committee of Session 2016–17 (PDF 157 KB)

Where it stands

The inquiry is closed, opened 7 June 2016.

The committee has published 2 reports, most recently 6th Report - High heels and workplace dress codes on 25 January 2017.

The government's response to each report

6th Report - High heels and workplace dress codes

No government response is linked to this report.

1st Report - High heels and workplace dress codes

Published 21 April 2017.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The Government "welcomes" the Committees' work and recommendations, says the existing law is adequate, and sets out action on guidance and awareness while declining to change penalties or tribunal powers.

  • On awareness, it "welcome[s]" the recommendation for a campaign, with the GEO working with Acas, the EHRC and the HSE to "explore options" for raising further awareness. It is "exploring the scope" to extend this to older students.
  • It "aim[s] to publish" new employer guidance on dress codes in "summer 2017", and "will consider" the Committees' list of dress code requirements in developing it.
  • On legitimate aims, it "will certainly consider" including the suggested aims as illustrative examples in guidance, but does "not favour a prescriptive approach" in legislation, so that courts and tribunals can consider each case's circumstances.
  • On penalties and injunctions, it considers the current guidelines "proportionate and fit for purpose", and thinks injunctions by employment tribunals would be "disproportionate".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error

Recommendations and conclusions 0 shown

No recommendations or conclusions are indexed for this inquiry yet.

Reports

2 reports

Oral evidence sessions

2 sessions

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

Date Session and witnesses Source
12 Jul 2016
Oral evidence session
No witnesses recorded
View ↗
28 Jun 2016
Oral evidence session
No witnesses recorded
View ↗

Correspondence

1 letter

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.