Source · Select Committees · Treasury Committee
1st Report - The Office for Value for Money
Treasury Committee
HC 521
Published 20 January 2025
Recommendations
6
Mandate the Treasury to set out OVfM recommendations, acceptance decisions, and implementation monitoring.
Recommendation
To maximise concrete outcomes from this project, the OVfM must specify before it is disbanded which parts of the Government should take responsibility for implementing its recommendations and by what timetable. To that end, the Treasury must set out the …
Read more
HM Treasury
View Details →
Conclusions (7)
1
Conclusion
The Treasury must provide an estimate of how much the OVfM will cost including the cost of any external consultants it intends to procure, and then provide the actual cost of OVfM after it completes its initial work. (Recommendation, Paragraph 6) Duplication
2
Conclusion
The OVfM must explain how it will interact with existing organisations and frameworks in government and the public sector that are already tasked with delivering value for money to avoid unnecessary duplication and to utilise existing expertise. (Recommendation, Paragraph 11) Value for money studies
3
Conclusion
The Treasury must clarify publicly by the end of January which departmental agencies or budgets will be subject to OVfM value for money studies. (Recommendation, Paragraph 17) Investment proposals
4
Conclusion
The Treasury must clarify how the OVfM will scrutinise investment proposals in the Spending Review process. This should include the criteria by which the OVfM selects investment proposals for scrutiny. The Treasury should also provide the method by which such investment proposals will be scrutinised, including the time horizon over …
5
Conclusion
The Treasury must set out how and when it will evaluate the OVfM’s work, including specifying the metrics and key performance indicators that it will use to evaluate the overall worth of the OVfM project. (Recommendation, Paragraph 21) Outcomes
7
Conclusion
The OVfM’s task is challenging because it is lightly resourced, and it has only a very short period of time to drive tangible improvements in efficiency in departments’ spending during the Spending Review period. Its worth will depend on its ability to identify and to deliver meaningful, original new ways …
8
Conclusion
At the end of its work on the Spending Review, the OVfM should provide a short report to the Committee covering the following: